12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gloria Ladson-Billings 145<br />

latent memories of these lived experiences are still lingering into the consciousness of many<br />

groups today, including the oppressed <strong>and</strong> the oppressor. Fears <strong>and</strong> reprisals of past history are<br />

not easily forgotten <strong>and</strong> influence the practices, policies, <strong>and</strong> even governmental climates. These<br />

historical references have been imprinted upon the various cultural identities of our society.<br />

As this country attempts to recover from these horrors of the past upon minority residents,<br />

the political <strong>and</strong> economic climate, traditionally established to benefit one group of residents,<br />

permeates through our laws, institutions, <strong>and</strong> society to favor a power base of affluent Caucasian<br />

men. This imbalance resulted in prejudicial ideas <strong>and</strong> misconceptions about children of color <strong>and</strong><br />

their families. The educational institutions have evolved into setting expectations that assume each<br />

child learns in a uniform style. Teachers, specifically, have been trained to use a deficit approach<br />

when teaching African American children <strong>and</strong> other children of color. This approach came to<br />

the forefront of societal attitude after the Moynihan Report of the 1960s, requested by President<br />

Lyndon Johnson for justifying his War on Poverty Program. This controversial report highlighted<br />

a perceived pathology of African American families such as absent fathers, unstable family<br />

structure, households headed by poorly educated, single females, <strong>and</strong> joblessness. It emphasized<br />

the achievement of Anglo Middle America <strong>and</strong> implied that the “Negro” family needed assistance<br />

in the socialization of their children to attain an acceptable level of functional family structure.<br />

In sharp contrast, Ladson-Billings, in her research, found that successful teachers of African<br />

American children used the strengths approach. Teachers using this approach were observed as<br />

truly caring about the children they taught, they were dedicated to their students, they embraced<br />

their students’ diversity positively, <strong>and</strong>, most important, they expected their students to strive to<br />

achieve at the highest level that their personal capabilities allowed.<br />

A component of culturally relevant pedagogy is that it empowers students to achieve socially,<br />

intellectually, <strong>and</strong> emotionally by utilizing students’ cultural contexts, or what Ladson-Billings<br />

calls “cultural referents,” to make connections with the world around them. Ladson-Billings<br />

discovered that successful teachers of African American children extended their teaching beyond<br />

the classroom. These teachers designed learning activities that incorporated the community.<br />

Referencing the acquisition of knowledge to preexisting, relevant political <strong>and</strong> social issues<br />

made learning meaningful, exciting, <strong>and</strong> attainable. Engaging the students directly with issues<br />

of society, <strong>and</strong> then looping it back to their own cultural contexts or referents, made the lessons<br />

relevant to the students. Eventually, the students embraced their own knowledge, developed their<br />

own confidence to learn, <strong>and</strong> with the teacher’s assistance began to underst<strong>and</strong> the inherent power<br />

they possessed to conquer misguided expectations <strong>and</strong> make a difference in their lives <strong>and</strong> the<br />

livesofothers.<br />

Ladson-Billings has also been interested in preparing teachers to teach in a diverse society.<br />

Walking into a classroom unprepared to teach in a culturally explosive setting can be potentially<br />

devastating for the educator <strong>and</strong> potentially incomplete for the student. In her Teach for Diversity<br />

(TFD) project in the mid- to late 1990s, Ladson-Billings <strong>and</strong> her colleagues realized there was<br />

disparity between the way pre-teacher programs prepared novice teachers <strong>and</strong> the preconceived<br />

expectations of being placed in an urban setting of students with various racial, ethnic, <strong>and</strong><br />

socioeconomic backgrounds blended together. The Teaching for Diversity program addressed<br />

these issues by guiding the pre-service teachers to underst<strong>and</strong> three fundamental principles: (a)<br />

human diversity, (b) equity, <strong>and</strong> (c) social justice, <strong>and</strong> then applying these principles in settings<br />

during their field experiences, where the gap between theory <strong>and</strong> practice could be bridged.<br />

In a subsequent publication based on this 15-month project, Crossing Over to Canaan (2001),<br />

Ladson-Billings reflected on her own teaching experiences in her early years in Philadelphia to<br />

account for the necessity to prepare novice teachers for the challenges of teaching in diverse<br />

settings. She then offers practical models for teaching in these highly diverse environments by<br />

implementing those principles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!