12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 47<br />

Implications of Cultural Psychology for<br />

Guiding <strong>Educational</strong> Practice: Teaching<br />

<strong>and</strong> Learning as Cultural Practices<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

PATRICK M. JENLINK AND KAREN E. JENLINK<br />

Psychology, in particular educational psychology, has struggled with a crisis of identity in recent<br />

years, beset by questions of allegiances, values, <strong>and</strong> sense of place within education <strong>and</strong> society<br />

(O’Donnel <strong>and</strong> Levin, 2001). Historically, educational psychology has focused on prioritizing<br />

precision <strong>and</strong> theoretical parsimony over underst<strong>and</strong>ing the phenomena of learning as situated in<br />

educational contexts such as schools; contexts that do not lend to precision <strong>and</strong> parsimony (Turner<br />

<strong>and</strong> Meyer, 2000). Emergent in the ongoing debate <strong>and</strong> direction in educational psychology as<br />

an evolving field is the place of cultural psychology—cultural historical activity theory—as an<br />

important consideration in reconstructing the identity of educational psychology in relation to<br />

educational practice, <strong>and</strong> more importantly, in reconstructing our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of cognition <strong>and</strong><br />

learning within the situated nature of human activity in educational settings.<br />

Cultural-historical, sociocultural, sociohistorical, <strong>and</strong> cognitive theorists have advanced differing<br />

perspectives of learning in the past two decades, which have been instructive in helping to develop<br />

new underst<strong>and</strong>ings of how both students <strong>and</strong> teachers learn (Brown et al., 1989; Engeström<br />

et al., 1999; Fosnot, 1996; Lave, 1988; Rogoff <strong>and</strong> Lave, 1984; Vygotsky, 1978). Premised on<br />

the situatedness of learning, historically, socially, <strong>and</strong> culturally, a cultural psychology—culturalhistorical<br />

activity theory—perspective (Cole, 1996) underst<strong>and</strong>s that learning occurs while individuals<br />

(students <strong>and</strong> teachers alike) participate in the sociocultural activities within <strong>and</strong> across<br />

the various communities of practice in which membership is held <strong>and</strong> practiced. The situated nature<br />

of learning is transformative, reflexively shaping <strong>and</strong> being shaped by the learner’s cognitive<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural processes <strong>and</strong> practices, <strong>and</strong> view of reality as the learners participate within <strong>and</strong><br />

across communities of diversity <strong>and</strong> difference (Cole, 1998).<br />

In this chapter, the authors will examine the use of cultural psychology for guiding educational<br />

practice, in particular educational practice in relation to learning <strong>and</strong> teaching in cultural–historical<br />

contexts where children come from many different home cultures, ethnicities, languages, <strong>and</strong> social<br />

classes. The authors undertake to: (1) examine the relationship between culture <strong>and</strong> activity;<br />

(2) explicate, using activity theory as a guiding framework, patterned ways of conduct of educational<br />

practice as activities or cultural practices, examining the import of mediational tools <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!