12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

386 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

THE CENTRALITY OF CULTURAL MEDIATION IN LEARNING<br />

AND DEVELOPMENT<br />

Why does it matter that we undertake research that helps us better underst<strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

socialization <strong>and</strong> its mediating influence on, <strong>and</strong> consequences for, student learning? It matters<br />

because social-cultural <strong>and</strong> cultural-historical psychology begins with the assumption of an<br />

intimate connection between the special environments that human beings inhabit <strong>and</strong> human<br />

psychological processes. In their work, James Wertsch <strong>and</strong> Michael Cole have explicated this<br />

link by explaining that the special quality of the human environment is that it is suffused with<br />

the achievements of prior generations in reified form. This notion is also found in the writings of<br />

cultural historical psychologists from many national traditions. John Dewey, for example, wrote<br />

that, from birth to death, we live in a world of persons <strong>and</strong> things which is in large measure what<br />

it is because of what has been done <strong>and</strong> transmitted from previous human activities. When this<br />

fact is ignored, experience is treated as if it were something that goes on exclusively inside an<br />

individuals’ body <strong>and</strong> mind. According to Dewey, experience does not occur in a vacuum; there<br />

are resources outside an individual that give rise to experience (Dewey, 1938 <strong>and</strong> 1963). The<br />

early writings of Russian cultural psychologists also emphasize the cultural medium. They argue<br />

that the special mental quality of human beings is their need <strong>and</strong> ability to mediate their actions<br />

through artifacts previously shaped by prior human practice, <strong>and</strong> to arrange for the rediscovery<br />

<strong>and</strong> appropriation of these forms of mediation by subsequent generations (Cole <strong>and</strong> Wertsch,<br />

2001). In this regard, Vygotsky (1981) wrote: “the central fact about human psychology is the<br />

fact of cultural mediation” (p. 166).<br />

From the perspective of the centrality of cultural mediation in mind <strong>and</strong> mental development,<br />

the mind develops through an interweaving of biology <strong>and</strong> the appropriation of the cultural<br />

heritage. Higher mental functions are, by definition, culturally mediated, involving an indirect<br />

action in which previously used artifacts are incorporated as an aspect of current action (Cole <strong>and</strong><br />

Wertsch, 2001).<br />

This perspective has several implications for learning <strong>and</strong> cognition. First, cultural artifacts do<br />

not simply serve to facilitate mental processes; they fundamentally shape <strong>and</strong> transform them.<br />

Second, because artifacts are themselves culturally, historically, <strong>and</strong> institutionally situated, all<br />

psychological functions begin <strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> to a large extent, remain culturally, historically, <strong>and</strong><br />

institutionally situated. There is no universally appropriate form of cultural mediation. A third<br />

implication is that context <strong>and</strong> action are not independent of each other. As Cole <strong>and</strong> Wertsch<br />

put it, “objects <strong>and</strong> contexts arise together as part of a single bio-social-cultural process of<br />

development.”<br />

These implications suggest that mind can no longer be seen as located solely inside the head.<br />

Rather, higher psychological functions include the biological individual, the cultural mediational<br />

artifacts, <strong>and</strong> the culturally structured social <strong>and</strong> natural environments of which individuals are a<br />

part. The positions of Dewey, Vygotsky, Cole, <strong>and</strong> Wertsch, <strong>and</strong> others on the centrality of cultural<br />

artifacts in human mental processes has great resonance in recent movements in cognitive science,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the position undergirds much of the emerging science on distributed cognition <strong>and</strong> situated<br />

learning.<br />

This primacy of cultural mediation in learning <strong>and</strong> development invites us as educators to<br />

provide opportunities for our most disadvantaged groups to draw on their cultural capital—<br />

what they bring from prior cultural socialization in their homes <strong>and</strong> communities—to support<br />

<strong>and</strong> enhance classroom learning for them. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how individuals or groups historically<br />

engage in shared practices in their cultural communities may account for dispositions they may<br />

have in new circumstances such as classroom learning.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!