12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

296 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

At the end of my undergraduate program, I took a drama course in which the majority of the<br />

time was spent doing dramatic improvisations. Through our weekly exercises I found myself<br />

inducted into a new way of being. In the dramatic improvisations, a person had only one task:<br />

pursue one’s assigned objective—for example, sell brushes—as resourcefully as possible. To be<br />

resourceful, one had to make sense of what everyone else in the improvisation was trying to do.<br />

If straightforward attempts at pursuing your objective were not successful, it was expected that<br />

your strategies might become more <strong>and</strong> more bizarre. We were all Mr Beans in the making. The<br />

experience in this class made me a more hopeful person. I finally realized that in any challenging<br />

situation in life, I had only to assign myself an objective <strong>and</strong> pursue it resourcefully. I also<br />

realized that I could complicate my objective to ensure acceptable consequences or conditions—<br />

for example, “I want to sell brushes, but in a way that doesn’t involve annoying people <strong>and</strong> doesn’t<br />

require too much of my time.”<br />

In my teacher education program I took a course on gifted education <strong>and</strong> then became involved<br />

as a researcher working with the classes of gifted grade 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 students who were using<br />

creative problem solving as an enrichment approach. The teachers used the Covington Crutchfield<br />

Productive Thinking Program for language arts <strong>and</strong> thereby introduced students to a broad range<br />

of strategies <strong>and</strong> meta-cognitive skills for creative problem solving. The program was based on a<br />

story about two children who were set problems by their uncle who was a detective. They learned<br />

to use strategies to explore all possibilities in order to eliminate all possible hypotheses except for<br />

the one right answer in “whodunit” fashion. Each week, a fellow graduate student <strong>and</strong> I visited the<br />

classes <strong>and</strong> invited the students to use group creative problem solving approaches with playful,<br />

everyday life problems. In this way, we endeavored to support their work with developing creative<br />

products or plans with open-ended problems as opposed to only “one right answer” problems.<br />

During my doctoral work with creative problem solving in the early 1980s, I read a broad range<br />

of literature about creativity <strong>and</strong> creative problem solving. I learned that creativity was understood<br />

as an important aspect of mental health <strong>and</strong> had consequences for physical health as one aged.<br />

This is not surprising given its association with characteristics such as flexibility, tolerance for<br />

ambiguity, being able to delay closure, openness to inner <strong>and</strong> outer experience, humor, being<br />

nonjudgmental, playfulness, intuitiveness, optimism, being self-accepting, <strong>and</strong> being willing to<br />

take risks.<br />

Through reading research on the processes used by adults who were recognized as being<br />

creative problem solvers in their work, I learned that they had an awareness of process <strong>and</strong> could<br />

monitor their own steps to ensure the opportunity to develop creative solutions. The literature<br />

was also replete with stories about how people access the rhythm of creative thinking when<br />

needed in their everyday lives. A key dynamic seemed to be preparation <strong>and</strong> then incubation.<br />

Preparation typically involved gathering all the information <strong>and</strong> related ideas pertaining to the<br />

problem <strong>and</strong> clarifying the attributes of a solution that would satisfy. It was important to refrain<br />

from attempting to develop solutions until preparation was completed.<br />

Once preparation was completed, one had to know how to enable <strong>and</strong> access one’s incubation<br />

processes. Incubation usually involves some form of relaxation, becoming quiet, <strong>and</strong> refraining<br />

from trying to solve the problem consciously. We have all heard stories about the ideas that come<br />

when one is in the bathtub, in bed, or driving. Even the 10-year-old children in my doctoral study<br />

were able to tell me about the process. As one boy said, “I think <strong>and</strong> I think as hard as I can. And<br />

then if I can’t think of anything I just wait for the idea to come.” Many of the children specifically<br />

mentioned breathing <strong>and</strong> relaxation <strong>and</strong> having a special place where they sit quietly <strong>and</strong> relax<br />

while they wait for their ideas.<br />

When ideas start to come, it’s very important to refrain from considering the ideas with<br />

skepticism. It’s as though there’s a little man in the back of your head who has figured it all out<br />

while you’ve been sleeping. He has made an answer, is trying to offer it, but will freeze up or run

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!