12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

590 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

material/textbook order/encode memories? Are the memories individually retrievable or a group’s collective<br />

memories? Whether individual or collective, how does the text/material privilege <strong>and</strong> legitimize<br />

their memories <strong>and</strong> silence or misrepresent the Other’s memories? How <strong>and</strong> why does one set of memories<br />

deny the authenticity of the Other’s memories? How <strong>and</strong> why do one set of memories constructed<br />

by one culture/nation/gender/race etc. minimize or trivialize the memories of the Other?<br />

4. Examine the academic disciplines that produce certain memories. What boundaries exist between the<br />

memories on one discipline <strong>and</strong> another? In what ways do the disciplinary boundaries heirarchize<br />

certain memories such as those belonging to the highest form of knowledge according to Aristotle’s<br />

theology, mathematics <strong>and</strong> physics, or the lowest in the hierarchy, which included fine arts, poetics, <strong>and</strong><br />

engineering? How <strong>and</strong> why are the values, knowledge, <strong>and</strong> the memories stored considered universal?<br />

How can you teach that disciplinary memories can be challenged? What creative memories are produced<br />

when interdisciplinary studies are integrated into the teaching/learning difficulties? In what ways might<br />

creative memories point to the problematic claim of scientific objectivity <strong>and</strong> neutrality?<br />

5. Locate yourself <strong>and</strong> your students in the memories of your teaching/learning contexts. What memories<br />

were/are produced by your ancestors? What gender, race, class, religion, history, nationality etc. shaped<br />

those memories? Those of your community? The institutions you teach <strong>and</strong> learn in? Whose memories<br />

are they? How did they become the official memories to teach/learn? Why? How are you/students<br />

positioned in the memories? Which positionings are privileged <strong>and</strong> which aren’t? Why?<br />

6. Contextualize your practices. What time <strong>and</strong> place were/are the memories generated from? What was/is<br />

the historical, cultural, economic, social, intellectual, <strong>and</strong> political contexts in which the memories were<br />

generated? What made certain memories generated in the different contexts have staying power? Why?<br />

What was going on in the different contexts that produced dominant memories <strong>and</strong> continue to reproduce<br />

exclusions, inequities, <strong>and</strong> social injustices? What memories are planted that are connected to other<br />

contexts that produces power <strong>and</strong> powerlessness? What memories produce <strong>and</strong> legitimize practices of<br />

violence, direct <strong>and</strong> symbolic?<br />

7. Challenge assumptions carried in unexamined memories. What types of teaching <strong>and</strong> evaluation can<br />

be used that teach students to challenge truths, knowledge, beliefs in memories that are passed off as<br />

absolute, stable, neutral, <strong>and</strong> official? How can a variety of texts (oral, film, etc.) on the same topic,<br />

issue, content, <strong>and</strong> history act as counter-memories? How can you teach readers to disrupt the stability<br />

<strong>and</strong> authority of canons (texts considered classics), thus disrupt established canons of memories? ? What<br />

intertextual readings (how the memories generated in one text are dependent on memories borrowed from<br />

other texts) of a text can reveal contradictory memories that challenge dominant/authoritative visions of<br />

society <strong>and</strong> human relations?<br />

These are only a few possible questions to initiate a change in pedagogical thinking <strong>and</strong><br />

practices that are mind-full, about Self, Others, <strong>and</strong> relationships of power at the individual,<br />

societal, institutional, <strong>and</strong> civilizational levels. Articulation of these <strong>and</strong> many other questions<br />

challenges <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>s the traditional constructions <strong>and</strong> practices of memory developed by<br />

disciplines such as educational psychology <strong>and</strong> modern educational policies <strong>and</strong> structures.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

I would like to thank Scott Powell, undergraduate student at UNB, for his insights <strong>and</strong> research<br />

assistance during the writing of this chapter. He has a postmodern memory that is always mindful<br />

of the past, present, <strong>and</strong> future of the Other.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Kaplan, P. S. (1990). <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology for Tomorrow’s Teacher. New York: West Publishing<br />

Company.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!