12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Constructivist/Engaged Learning Approaches 285<br />

<strong>and</strong> project-based learning. Engaged learning includes collaborative <strong>and</strong> cooperative, as well<br />

as individualized, activities. When engaged learning experiences are utilized in the classroom,<br />

students become independent thinkers <strong>and</strong> learners who participate in, <strong>and</strong> extend, their own<br />

learning processes. Students develop life-long skills <strong>and</strong> strategies that help them apply knowledge<br />

in situations outside the classroom. Students are actively involved in their own learning.<br />

Journal entry: I have always considered myself to be a good teacher; however, my goal is to be an effective<br />

one. I consider myself a life-long learner who attends workshops <strong>and</strong> reads educational material to improve<br />

my craft. Administrators <strong>and</strong> teachers have always complimented me on my classroom management, <strong>and</strong><br />

parents would request me for their children because of my structured environment in the classroom. My<br />

test scores on the state test were always impressive because I taught what needed to be taught in order for<br />

students to be successful on the exam. Now, I realize there are holes in my teaching, gaps between what my<br />

students need to learn at the moment <strong>and</strong> what they need to learn to become life-long learners. I don’t want<br />

my students to learn something that will benefit them for the moment; I want them to acquire knowledge<br />

which they can utilize the rest of their lives.<br />

As instructional issues are discussed <strong>and</strong> debated in schools today, big differences exist between<br />

constructivism, a theory about knowledge <strong>and</strong> learning in the information age, <strong>and</strong> traditional<br />

practices of teaching <strong>and</strong> learning. The traditional learning model views the teacher as the source<br />

of knowledge <strong>and</strong> the students as the receptacles of knowledge. While the students listen, the<br />

teacher is center stage, following the didactic model of teaching in which content information<br />

is provided by the teacher. Students are required to listen <strong>and</strong> “learn” (memorize) the content.<br />

In traditional teaching the previous background <strong>and</strong> experiences of students are not taken into<br />

account. Students sit still <strong>and</strong> absorb the information presented by the teacher, <strong>and</strong> students<br />

usually work alone. If they do work with others, groups are usually formed placing students of<br />

similar abilities together.<br />

This notion of teaching <strong>and</strong> learning contrasts with the constructivist/engaged learning model<br />

(Figure 39.1) that emphasizes the creation of active learning environments promoting learnercentered<br />

critical thinking, collaboration, <strong>and</strong> discovery. The constructivist model of teaching<br />

<strong>and</strong> learning focuses on the student. The teacher designs student-centered lessons <strong>and</strong> facilitates<br />

student learning during the lesson. Students are provided with opportunities to think, problemsolve,<br />

investigate, <strong>and</strong> explore; <strong>and</strong> they are allowed to individually <strong>and</strong> collaboratively construct<br />

their own underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the content. As students collaborate, discuss, <strong>and</strong> share their prior<br />

knowledge <strong>and</strong> experiences with each other, they learn the content of the lesson.<br />

Journal entry: After the presentation of the history of constructivism, I realized the theory is not new. It<br />

has been around for hundreds of years. It’s interesting that it’s been hundreds of years since constructivist<br />

learning was first introduced, <strong>and</strong> we are still working on ways to implement these strategies. I feel there are<br />

several reasons for this. It is very difficult for teachers to let students be responsible for their own learning.<br />

It is easier for students to depend on their teachers to “spoon-feed” the information.<br />

In order to provide children with the skills they need to function in today’s society, educators<br />

are examining different teaching <strong>and</strong> learning models that differ from traditional approaches<br />

used in the past. Constructivist education empowers student learning through the construction<br />

of meaning in a learner-centered inquiry environment. Learning in constructivist terms is both<br />

the process <strong>and</strong> the result of questioning, interpreting, <strong>and</strong> analyzing information; using this<br />

information <strong>and</strong> thinking process to develop, build, <strong>and</strong> alter our meaning <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of concepts <strong>and</strong> ideas; <strong>and</strong> integrating current experiences with our past experiences <strong>and</strong> what<br />

we already know about a given subject. Engaged learning <strong>and</strong> the constructivist learning model

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!