12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

286 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

Figure 39.1<br />

Constructing New Knowledge<br />

Recognize relevant<br />

elements in new<br />

learning<br />

Apply current<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ings<br />

Think about the main<br />

elements in the new<br />

learning experiences Compare prior<br />

knowledge with the<br />

new knowledge<br />

Prior knowledge influences<br />

knowledge constructed from<br />

new learning experiences.<br />

New Knowledge<br />

Previous Knowledge Base<br />

Constructing New Knowledge<br />

Modify underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of new knowledge<br />

are in direct contrast to traditional methods in which teachers provide students with unchanging<br />

knowledge they are to memorize.<br />

Journal entry: I thought I knew what constructivism was, but the more I learn, the less I know. I guess that<br />

this is true of most things in life. I think an important word here is disequilibrium. To have to examine <strong>and</strong><br />

reflect on my practices <strong>and</strong> beliefs of education has had an unbalancing effect. I guess I thought I had it all<br />

together before I discovered constructivist approaches to use in my classroom.<br />

If we are to meet students’ needs <strong>and</strong> help them to be successful now <strong>and</strong> in the future,<br />

classroom planning, instructional practices, <strong>and</strong> the way we assess will undergo changes. Some<br />

recommendations include:<br />

1. recognizing, planning, <strong>and</strong> creating learning experiences that cover the skills that are to be learned at<br />

every grade level versus teaching lessons that do not follow the recommended curriculum<br />

2. planning learning experiences that will increase self-directed learning versus teacher-directed learning<br />

3. planning for learning that is collaborative <strong>and</strong> communicative versus individual learning<br />

4. the use of different instructional methods <strong>and</strong> grouping versus traditional whole-class instruction<br />

5. instructional planning that recognizes student differences versus addressing differences after students<br />

have failed<br />

6. using multiple forms of diagnostic assessment (formative <strong>and</strong> summative) before, during, <strong>and</strong> after the<br />

lesson versus summative assessments at the end of the lesson<br />

7. recognizing <strong>and</strong> believing all students can learn versus sorting students out (tracking) to provide them<br />

with different learning experiences that might not be at grade level or up to the st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

Teachers want to improve classroom practices, but have doubts about utilizing learner-centered<br />

approaches in their classrooms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!