12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

614 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

brain is creating neural pathways to categorize <strong>and</strong> create a prototype to remember what a lemon<br />

tastes like. It is here that parallel processing computers along with Magnetic Resonance Imagings<br />

(MRI) <strong>and</strong> Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans have been vital. What neuroscientists<br />

have discovered/created is a Baudrillardian example of a simulation creating an underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of reality. Through the use of parallel processing computers, neuroscientists have been able to<br />

create artificial neural networks that provide clues as to how actual neural networks function.<br />

For example, neuroscientists have created computer programs using activation patterns, parallel<br />

distribution processing, <strong>and</strong> a method called backpropagation (a method to discover the various<br />

weights of synaptic connections) to produce a computer program that can recognize faces in a<br />

manner just as effective as humans. This program created by Garrison Cottrell <strong>and</strong> his laboratory<br />

group with its backpropagated synaptic connections acted similar to the way the human brain<br />

does. It created prototypes of male <strong>and</strong> female faces <strong>and</strong> from this was able to recognize familiar<br />

faces introduced to it in a training set.<br />

Taking this knowledge of how parallel processing <strong>and</strong> activation patterns function in computers,<br />

neuroscientists with the assistance of MRI <strong>and</strong> PET scans are trying to underst<strong>and</strong>ing what part<br />

of the brain performs what functions when dealing with activities such as recognizing familiar<br />

faces. PET scans provide neuroscientists with the ability to watch which part of the brain <strong>and</strong><br />

which neurons are activated causing an increase of blood to that area of the brain. MRIs provide<br />

the computer images of the brain that can be dissected <strong>and</strong> exposed to the cubic millimeter.<br />

The output from these three computer-generated images—artificial neural networks, PET scans,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the images of the brain garnered from MRIs—have given neuroscientists much to speculate<br />

about.<br />

THE HOPE OF NEUROSCIENCE<br />

The successes of neuroscience in the last twenty years have lead to the rethinking of basic<br />

psychological debates that have existed since the inception of the discipline in the late 1800s. One<br />

of those debates is the stale nature/nurture debate. This debate is prominent in the debate over the<br />

intelligence of a child: is the child born intelligent or is the child a product of its environment?<br />

The debate has become a dreadful way to justify inequalities in places such as United States<br />

<strong>and</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> where political officials <strong>and</strong> policy makers pay lip service to notions of equality.<br />

Neuroscience weighs in on this debate <strong>and</strong> suggests that when it comes to the development of<br />

the brain it is both nature <strong>and</strong> nurture but once the child is born it is nurturing that is most<br />

important. Each neuron is “predisposed” to perform a certain function within the brain (nature),<br />

however, when a child is born all neurons are fair game <strong>and</strong> can be used to perform any function<br />

no matter what its destiny was. After a child is born <strong>and</strong> neural networks are constructed, the<br />

first networks to be created are not the last. The human continues to develop neural networks that<br />

help them underst<strong>and</strong> the world around them. The old adage one cannot teach an old dog new<br />

tricks fits perfectly in a world where certain ideological policy makers want to limit the support<br />

governments give to certain social groups. However, the reality of the brain is that all brains from<br />

those of a child to that of a senior citizen are constantly growing, <strong>and</strong> if given a chance all brains<br />

can be nurtured to accomplish things psychologists thought impossible.<br />

This ability to create new neural networks in the lifespan of the brain leads us into the issue<br />

of multiculturalism. The neurophilosopher Paul Churchl<strong>and</strong> believes that those people who are<br />

able to create numerous neural pathways in order to see <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> moral dilemmas in the<br />

world will be those people who are better adapted for a diverse world. Given this assumption<br />

about the need <strong>and</strong> ability to create more than one neural pathway for moral reasoning, <strong>and</strong> given<br />

the growth of diverse cultures within the United States <strong>and</strong> other nations, it is an imperative that<br />

schools begin to nurture in the minds of children alternative ways to see the world. Those children

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!