12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Curriculum, Instruction, <strong>and</strong> Assessment 833<br />

Also, to function independently individuals need to be able to self-assess rather than rely on<br />

external assessments by other individuals. Authentic assessment strategies need to be acquired<br />

because when the assessment need arises, it will be in a real-life context, not in a decontextualized<br />

classroom context. How then are these requirements of multiple <strong>and</strong> authentic assessment in later<br />

real-life situations best met? The answer is found in how professionals engage in assessment.<br />

They use journals, rubrics, portfolios, <strong>and</strong> peer <strong>and</strong> self-assessments.<br />

Teachers <strong>and</strong> Students as Scholar-Practitioners<br />

Reconceptualized education requires teachers <strong>and</strong> students to perform roles that are quite<br />

different from their roles in a technical rational system. One term that can be used to capture<br />

this very different role is scholar-practitioner. Scholar-practitioners are individuals who have the<br />

attitude <strong>and</strong> ability to utilize scholarly <strong>and</strong> experiential knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills, viewed by them<br />

as dynamically interrelated entities, in their underst<strong>and</strong>ing of phenomena <strong>and</strong> in their solution<br />

of problems. Teachers as scholar-practitioners are not the deskilled technicians of technical<br />

rational systems, but individuals who as scholars can use scholarly knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills to better<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> shape their practice. They are practitioners who can use their practical knowledge<br />

to critique the formal theory <strong>and</strong> the theory that emerges from their practice. Above all, scholarpractitioners<br />

are critical in that the theory that they engage <strong>and</strong> the practice in which they are<br />

involved is critically interrogated with a fundamental concern for the promotion of social justice,<br />

an ethic of caring, <strong>and</strong> democratic participation. Through their scholarship <strong>and</strong> practice, they are<br />

not micro-managed individuals but self-empowered professionals who engage in a critical praxis<br />

in their classrooms, schools, <strong>and</strong> communities.<br />

Teachers such as this are skeptics <strong>and</strong> critics who, through their critical interrogation of<br />

social phenomena, strive to facilitate the construction of egalitarian, caring, <strong>and</strong> democratic<br />

communities. In the context of educational communities such as the classroom, the school, <strong>and</strong><br />

the larger community in which the school is nested, they use their interdisciplinary orientation,<br />

critical thinking, <strong>and</strong> postformal perspective to construct effective <strong>and</strong> egalitarian pedagogical<br />

environments. As researchers, they are bricoleurs who utilize a wide range of inquiry methods <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge bases to build egalitarian communities through the use of a critical pedagogy. They<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> the situatedness of their own teaching <strong>and</strong> learning, <strong>and</strong> critically reflect upon their<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ings as they are socially constructed in relation to the changing context of their place<br />

<strong>and</strong> their social interactions with others. They are critically pragmatic in that they are consequence<br />

focused, <strong>and</strong> critically interrogate their actions <strong>and</strong> the consequences of their actions. They value<br />

self-assessment <strong>and</strong> engage in continuous authentic <strong>and</strong> multiple assessment of themselves <strong>and</strong><br />

their activity.<br />

Likewise, students in a reconceptualized educational environment are scholar-practitioners in<br />

training. Unlike technical rational systems, students are empowered <strong>and</strong> active constructors of<br />

knowledge within authentic contexts. As student researchers, they are personally empowered<br />

through a critical pedagogy that requires them to experiment, discover, create, problem-solve,<br />

think, <strong>and</strong> act. By developing cooperative skills <strong>and</strong> dispositions, they learn the value of fostering<br />

community <strong>and</strong> the necessity of critically focused participation within a community. Through<br />

authentic assessment, they experience the validation <strong>and</strong> empowerment that is the result of<br />

personal growth. And in the end, they are transformed into life-long learners.<br />

FURTHER READING<br />

Thornburg, D. (2002). The New Basics: Education <strong>and</strong> the Future of Work in the Telematic Age. Alex<strong>and</strong>ria,<br />

VA: Association for Supervision <strong>and</strong> Curriculum Development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!