12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

534 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

acquisitive conception of experience as capital to be obtained <strong>and</strong> parlayed into credit, income,<br />

or profit.<br />

Excluded are realms of experiential learning that do not correspond to knowledge categories<br />

most recognized in education, such as disciplinary knowledge driving curriculum areas, technical<br />

vocational knowledge, communicative knowledge (underst<strong>and</strong>ing people <strong>and</strong> society), or moralemancipatory<br />

knowledge (discerning systemic injustice, inequities, <strong>and</strong> one’s implication in<br />

these). Sexuality, desire <strong>and</strong> fantasy, for example, tend to be ignored in educational discourses of<br />

experiential learning. Nonconscious <strong>and</strong> intuitive knowledge, knowledge of micro-negotiations<br />

within systems that struggles in bodies <strong>and</strong> discourses, <strong>and</strong> knowledge without voice or subject<br />

that lives in collective action also tend to be bracketed out of these discourses.<br />

CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING<br />

EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING<br />

Given these four problems in educational theory of experiential learning of mind–body separation,<br />

emphasis on reflection, managerial disciplines, <strong>and</strong> exclusion, why not simply jettison<br />

the experiential learning discourse? The short answer is that its democratic intents are important<br />

in an institutionalized world where the cult of credentialing challenges any knowledge generated<br />

outside market usefulness. Experience focuses on the messy problems <strong>and</strong> tedious practices of<br />

everyday life which continue to run counter to the logic, language, <strong>and</strong> disciplines of science<br />

<strong>and</strong> the academy, particularly those privileging the rational <strong>and</strong>, increasingly, the linguistic <strong>and</strong><br />

discursive. Experience exceeds language <strong>and</strong> rationality, because it emphasizes the crucial locatedness<br />

of bodies in material reality that cannot be dismissed as a solely linguistic construction,<br />

as certain forms of postmodern thought would try to do. Indeed, this signifier of experiential<br />

learning is useful to challenge assumptions about the nature of reality <strong>and</strong> of experience. When<br />

reexamined in terms of its textures <strong>and</strong> movements, attention to experience has the potential to<br />

unlock a liberal humanist preoccupation with individual minds, knowledge canons, <strong>and</strong> rational<br />

reflection, <strong>and</strong> shift the focus to embodied, collective knowledge emerging in moments <strong>and</strong> webs<br />

of everyday action.<br />

The embodiment of experiential learning is an ancient concept: indigenous ways of knowing,<br />

for example, have maintained that spirit, mind, <strong>and</strong> body are not separated in experience, that<br />

learning is more focused on being than doing, <strong>and</strong> that experiential knowledge is produced<br />

within the collective, not the individual, mind. For example, a Canadian researcher named Julia<br />

Cruishank shows how the life stories <strong>and</strong> knowledge development of the Yukon First Nations<br />

people are completely entangled with the glaciers around which they live. The glaciers are not<br />

inert environment, but alive <strong>and</strong> moving, rumbling <strong>and</strong> responding to small human actions; the<br />

lines between human <strong>and</strong> nonhuman, <strong>and</strong> social history <strong>and</strong> natural history, are fluid. Writers on<br />

Africentric knowledge, so named to distinguish it from eurocentric perspectives that fragment <strong>and</strong><br />

rationalize experience, have also shown how learning is embodied <strong>and</strong> rooted in collective historic<br />

experiences of oppression, pain, <strong>and</strong> love which are inseparable from the emotional, the spiritual,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the natural. The difference here from mentalist or reflection-dependent underst<strong>and</strong>ings of<br />

experiential learning is accepting the moment of experiential learning as occurring within action,<br />

within <strong>and</strong> among bodies. An embodied approach underst<strong>and</strong>s the sensual body as a site of<br />

learning itself, rather than as a raw producer of data that the mind will fashion into knowledge<br />

formations.<br />

Embodiment however must not be mistaken for essentializing the individual physical body.<br />

The body’s surfaces can be misleading; while sites for sensuality, they are neither identifiers<br />

nor boundaries separating what is inside from what is outside. The core conceptual shift of<br />

an embodied experiential learning is from a learning subject to the larger collective, to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!