12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

fragmenting bits of information from the past <strong>and</strong> present, <strong>and</strong> manages instead to keep all of the<br />

information together. Needless to say, as Maxine Greene (1995) implies in Releasing the Imagination,<br />

critical consciousness propels the race discussion to “open up lived worlds to reflection<br />

<strong>and</strong> transformation” (p. 59).<br />

Further relating to critical constructivism, Maturana <strong>and</strong> Varela’s (1980) cognitive theory of<br />

enactivism involves a critical change as well. Enactivism proposes that individuals have the<br />

ability to transport select schema or inner knowledges to different spontaneous situations in order<br />

to construct or create individual experiences. The power to do so, Maturana <strong>and</strong> Varela argue,<br />

lies within, stemming from multiple relationships. Tatum exemplifies how the use of schema<br />

aids in the construction of race identity as she projects the possibility that black kids might be<br />

able to mobilize themselves for change if they would begin to see themselves as complete <strong>and</strong><br />

not fragmented by life’s varied experiences. This thought process, however, dem<strong>and</strong>s a critical<br />

mind that knows, or has the ability to distinguish, myth from reality as well as the ability to<br />

appropriately use that knowledge under varying circumstances at any given time. Therefore, it is<br />

our social responsibility to nurture <strong>and</strong> stimulate more critical minds so that in turn, schema may<br />

be implemented differently from the past <strong>and</strong> eventually used as a tool for change.<br />

The possibility of black kids using critical schema to carve out a new existence from the “what<br />

is” lived world, incorporating an enactivist psychological perspective, would ultimately be up to<br />

the individual. Therefore, how they internalize their collective past <strong>and</strong> present life relationships,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the responses <strong>and</strong> interactions engendered by the larger society would be a consideration<br />

in the change process. In this manner, the individual would then see his or her self as capable<br />

of taking control of spontaneous as well as long-st<strong>and</strong>ing situations with the “self” as the main<br />

component. According to Varela’s autopoiesis, self-organization or self-production, individuals<br />

are allowed to be in a lifelong marathon with self-(re)construction. Tatum proposes multiple<br />

ways, which were previously mentioned to engage in that reality. In other words, the essence of<br />

this theory gives individuals power to create a world, which then affords, as Kincheloe espouses,<br />

a new era of immanence, or “what could be” in our web of reality. Ultimately, in our ZPDs, in our<br />

relationship with others, the web of reality is open to what we can conceive <strong>and</strong> then construct<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or reconstruct.<br />

Critical immanence helps us to see possibilities buried deep within our minds that we lost access<br />

to or misinterpreted because of lack of perspective or insight, social positioning, or inability to<br />

change the “what is.” Regrettably, it seems that individuals often struggle <strong>and</strong> sometimes respond<br />

without challenge to life’s moment-by-moment encounters in inappropriate or self-damaging<br />

ways. Through Tatum, we discover that problems with race might have internal origins but they<br />

ultimately go beyond the “self.” Consequently, the “self” is a good starting place, but by far not<br />

the only stop on the continuum of hope. If one can digest reality <strong>and</strong> possibly feel the frightening<br />

fury that exists in racist acts <strong>and</strong> through this process, recognize how racism has spiraled out of<br />

control over time, then it might be possible to get its damaging presence into perspective.<br />

It might be possible to imagine the “real” meaning of the fluidity of change <strong>and</strong> the existence<br />

of limitless possibilities by extricating ourselves from the devaluing <strong>and</strong> demeaning stories,<br />

both past <strong>and</strong> present, of racism <strong>and</strong> realigning our lived order by first, critically deconstructing<br />

the negative <strong>and</strong>, then, critically reconstructing something new. It is the use of criticality that<br />

seeks to change this perspective. Tatum’s honest <strong>and</strong> revealing conversations, which encourage<br />

awareness of the interconnected nature of life, along with the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> awareness of<br />

the psychological roots of racial identity <strong>and</strong> its formation, provide a working format for the<br />

beginning of transformative change about race relations <strong>and</strong> the long-st<strong>and</strong>ing effects of racism.<br />

As stated in Kincheloe’s introduction to this encyclopedia, knowledge can never st<strong>and</strong> alone or<br />

be complete in <strong>and</strong> of itself <strong>and</strong>, thus, the context of meaning in Tatum’s scholarly works comes<br />

from the heated conversations about race, the socialization process, embedded implicit <strong>and</strong>/or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!