12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Spiritual Nature of Postformal Thought 963<br />

will focus instead on the two most directly related to our concern for human emancipation <strong>and</strong> a<br />

sense of personal agency (for both teachers <strong>and</strong> students). Those issues, not surprisingly, relate to<br />

the increasing emphasis on accountability <strong>and</strong> control <strong>and</strong> the identity this requires the fledgling<br />

early childhood professional to assume.<br />

One clear <strong>and</strong> immediate indication of change in this area is seen in the tables of contents.<br />

Assessment becomes increasingly emphasized—moving from only a couple of subheadings over<br />

short sections in the seventh edition to a full chapter near the end of the book in the eighth edition,<br />

to being a chapter in Part I in the ninth edition (following a chapter reconfigured to feature<br />

“public policy”). Such space allotment <strong>and</strong> placement indicate valuation. Naturally, as one topic<br />

moves up the value scale, something else must move down. In this case, that appears to be the<br />

notion of child-centered education <strong>and</strong> related topics. We find this especially disturbing since<br />

early childhood education has, in many regards, been the last bastion of a concern for educating<br />

the whole person in our schools.<br />

As of the seventh edition, child-centered education is “alive <strong>and</strong> well” in the primary grades<br />

(Morrison, 1998, p. 261). It is recommended for preschoolers, with a gentle warning to “strive to<br />

provide a balance between academics <strong>and</strong> all areas of development” (p. 216). A lengthy section<br />

on Open Education describes it as child-centered education:<br />

Adults do not do all the talking, decision making, organizing, <strong>and</strong> planning when it is children who need to<br />

develop these skills. Open education seeks to return the emphasis to the child, where it rightfully belongs.<br />

Open education teachers respect students <strong>and</strong> believe children are capable of assuming responsibility for their<br />

own learning. Teachers consider themselves primarily teachers of children, not of subject matter ...(1998,<br />

p. 87; emphasis in original)<br />

In addition, child-centered education is featured prominently in the seventh edition in a Chapter<br />

1 section entitled “The Return of Child-Centered Education” (p. 55). The same section appears<br />

in the eighth edition (2001, p. 95), although it is downgraded from Chapter 1 to Chapter 3 (“The<br />

Past <strong>and</strong> the Present: Prologue to the Future”). Significantly, this section disappears in the ninth<br />

edition <strong>and</strong> the term “child-centered” begins to morph into a concept more compatible with the<br />

age of accountability. Readers are told it is “a widely used term misunderstood by many” (p. 104).<br />

Indeed, Chapter 1 implies the need for a redefinition of the term as it ends with a section entitled<br />

“A new meaning of child-centered education”<br />

Everything we discuss in this book is based on the child being the center of the teaching <strong>and</strong> learning<br />

processes. Unfortunately, not all teachers have practiced child-centered approaches, nor have they made<br />

children’s learning a high priority. This is changing. Included in the child-centered approach are the ideas<br />

that children can learn at high levels of achievement; that children are eager to learn; <strong>and</strong> that they are<br />

capable of learning more than many people thought they could. So a new concept of child-centeredness<br />

embraces the whole child in all dimensions: social, emotional, physical, linguistic, <strong>and</strong> cognitive. (2004,<br />

p. 24)<br />

A comparison of these two descriptions of child-centered education shows an unfortunate<br />

trend away from a pedagogy that is compatible with human emancipation. Success becomes<br />

synonymous with “achievement,” instead of with an increasing capacity for personal agency.<br />

In spite of the ninth edition’s satisfaction that the new child-centeredness embraces the whole<br />

child, we are concerned with the apparent move to value only that which is in line with current<br />

school reform goals of achievement on st<strong>and</strong>ardized tests for the purpose of bulking up the<br />

nation’s twenty-first-century workforce. Although the holistic approach in editions seven <strong>and</strong><br />

eight is considered valuable for the fact that it met a wide range of needs for children <strong>and</strong> their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!