15.12.2012 Views

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 29: Body mass index (BMI) of Filipino resp<strong>on</strong>dents.<br />

BMI (kg/m 2 ) Frequency Percentage Cumulative %<br />

40 8 15.1 100.0<br />

Total 53 100.0<br />

Table 30: Anthropometric indicators for Thai resp<strong>on</strong>dents.<br />

Table 31: Body mass index (BMI) of Thai resp<strong>on</strong>dents.<br />

ORWELL 97 Results<br />

N Mean ± S.D. Median Maximum<br />

Weight (kg) 196 75.63 ± 13.48 75.0 125.0<br />

BMI (kg/m 2 ) 194 29.68 ± 4.54 29.0 49.1<br />

Waist Circumference (cm) 195 91.495 ± 14.19 92.40 133.0<br />

Waist-to-hip Ratio, WHR 192 0.89 ± 0.09 0.90 1.10<br />

BMI (kg/m 2 ) Frequency Percentage Cumulative %<br />

40 5 2.6 100.0<br />

Total 194 100.0<br />

A self-reported measure of obesity–related quality of life<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>naire (ORWELL 97) was administered to <strong>the</strong><br />

resp<strong>on</strong>dents to assess whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir weight affect <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

quality of life. (Manucci et al., 1999) ORWELL 97<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sisted of an 18 item questi<strong>on</strong>s and for each item <strong>the</strong><br />

resp<strong>on</strong>dent scored <strong>on</strong> a 4-point Likert scale <strong>the</strong><br />

occurrence and severity of <strong>the</strong> symptom (occurrence)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> subjective relevance of <strong>the</strong> symptom-related<br />

impairment in <strong>the</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dent’s own life (relevance).<br />

The score of <strong>the</strong> item is calculated as <strong>the</strong> product of<br />

occurrence and relevance. The total ORWELL 97 score is<br />

obtained as <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> scores of individual items.<br />

Higher ORWELL 97 scores mean a lower quality of life.<br />

The results of ORWELL 97 scores for <strong>the</strong> entire data are<br />

shown in Table 32, with <strong>the</strong> mean total score of 53.3 ±<br />

34.7. The mean ORWELL 97-O (occurrence) is 27.9 ±<br />

17.1, and <strong>the</strong> mean ORWELL 97-R (relevance) is 25.4<br />

± 17.6. ORWELL 97 scores for Ind<strong>on</strong>esia, Philippines,<br />

and Thailand are 57.7 ± 37.6 (Table 33), 52.6 ± 33.0<br />

(Table 33), and 51.0 ± 32.1 (Table 33), respectively. In<br />

terms of quality of life am<strong>on</strong>g resp<strong>on</strong>dents, resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />

CHANGING LIFESTYLES AND HEALTH<br />

171<br />

in Thailand have a better quality of life than in <strong>the</strong><br />

Philippines and Ind<strong>on</strong>esia.<br />

Analysis of total ORWELL 97 scores based <strong>on</strong> sex, show<br />

that <strong>the</strong> total scores for males is 51.7 ± 32.6 (Table 34)<br />

and for females is 54.3 ± 35.5 (Table 34). These results<br />

indicated that <strong>the</strong> impact of obesity <strong>on</strong> quality of life is<br />

worse in females than in males.<br />

Table 32: ORWELL 97 total score for all resp<strong>on</strong>dents.<br />

Questi<strong>on</strong>naires R+O R O<br />

1. 3.38 ± 2.06 1.98 ± 1.03 1.40 ± 1.03<br />

2. 2.53 ± 1.99 1.63 ± 1.07 0.90 ± 0.92<br />

3. 2.22 ± 1.95 1.13 ± 1.02 1.09 ± 0.93<br />

4. 3.32 ± 1.83 1.49 ± 0.94 1.83 ± 0.89<br />

5. 3.11± 2.05 1.42 ± 1.01 1.69 ± 1.04<br />

6. 3.89 ± 1.90 1.82 ± 0.97 2.07 ± 0.93<br />

7. 4.11 ± 1.71 2.60 ± 0.74 1.51 ± 0.97<br />

8. 3.82 ± 1.78 2.55 ± 0.76 1.27 ± 1.02<br />

9. 2.94 ± 1.87 1.99 ± 0.93 0.95 ± 0.94<br />

10. 2.45 ± 1.98 1.10 ± 0.95 1.35 ± 1.03<br />

11. 2.80 ± 2.15 1.27 ± 1.04 1.53 ± 1.11<br />

12. 2.44 ± 1.95 1.14 ± 1.00 1.30 ± 0.94<br />

13. 2.72 ± 1.90 1.29 ± 0.92 1.43 ± 0.98<br />

14. 2.79 ± 1.89 1.51 ± 0.93 1.28 ± 0.97<br />

15. 2.41 ± 1.81 1.29 ± 0.91 1.12 ± 0.91<br />

16. 2.30 ± 1.86 1.10 ± 0.93 1.20 ± 0.94<br />

17. 2.86 ± 1.96 1.13 ± 0.92 1.73 ± 1.04<br />

18. 3.25 ± 2.08 1.51 ± 1.05 1.74 ± 1.03<br />

Total 53.34 ± 34.70 27.95 ± 17.11 25.39 ± 17.59<br />

Table 33: ORWELL 97 total scores am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

different nati<strong>on</strong>ality.<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>ality R+O R O<br />

Ind<strong>on</strong>esian 57.71 ± 37.60 30.31 ± 18.07 27.4 ± 19.53<br />

Filipino 52.61± 32.99 28.35 ± 16.13 24.26 ± 16.85<br />

Thai 50.98 ± 32.14 26.45 ± 16.06 24.53 ± 10.08<br />

Table 34: ORWELL 97 total scores by sex.<br />

Sex R+O R O<br />

Male 51.72 ± 32.58 27.61 ± 15.98 24.11 ± 16.62<br />

Female 54.27 ± 35.54 28.11 ± 17.62 26.16 ± 17.92<br />

Focus Group Discussi<strong>on</strong> (FGD)<br />

Focus group discussi<strong>on</strong>s were c<strong>on</strong>ducted to solicit more<br />

Ref lecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Human</strong> C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>: Change, C<strong>on</strong>flict and Modernity<br />

The Work of <strong>the</strong> 2004/2005 API Fellows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!