15.12.2012 Views

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

400 SESSION VI<br />

Table 5: Organizati<strong>on</strong> of Activities of Japanese Civil Society—Businessmen / Shareholder Suit Mechanism.<br />

Civil Society Activities Mechanism<br />

Civic<br />

Ombudsman<br />

(Osaka-based)<br />

Kabunushi<br />

Ombudsman<br />

Dec 1994: Filed a shareholder’s lawsuit against three companies, c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> giant Obayashi<br />

Corp., Kansai Electric Power Co., and Osaka Gas Co., in order to block political c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

(Japan Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Newswire: December 19, 1994)<br />

Jan 1996: Established at Osaka in order to exercise comm<strong>on</strong> shareholders’ legal rights, including<br />

making proposals and filing shareholder suits. It also m<strong>on</strong>itors corporate activities, using lawsuits<br />

when necessary to force disclosure of informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

June 1996 (Sumitomo Corporati<strong>on</strong> Case): Asked about <strong>the</strong> former president’s resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

for illegal trade, submitted <strong>the</strong> case to Osaka District Court to cancel “Shan Shan” meeting and<br />

submitted derivative suit against Sumitomo’s directors for resp<strong>on</strong>sibility of losses.<br />

Oct 2000: Filed a lawsuit to recover damages against former directors of Sumitomo<br />

Corporati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

June 2001: Filed a lawsuit against <strong>the</strong> major companies’ executives to return m<strong>on</strong>ies illegally<br />

d<strong>on</strong>ated to a political party during capital deficit, e.g. 87 milli<strong>on</strong> yen claim against Kumagai<br />

Gumi’s executives. Such d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s were prohibited by <strong>the</strong> Political Fund C<strong>on</strong>trol Law. In<br />

Feb 2003, <strong>the</strong> Fukui District Court ordered <strong>the</strong> ex-president of Kumagai Gumi to reimburse<br />

27 milli<strong>on</strong> yen for d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s made from Apr 1998-Dec 1999, but dismissed demands to have<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r ex-president return d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s and to ban <strong>the</strong> current president from extending political<br />

d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s. (The Japan Times: 27 June 2001; www.japan-press.co.jp/2385/jbf2.html; Mainichi<br />

Shimbun: 12 Feb 2003; The Japan Times: 13 Feb 2003).<br />

Oct 2002: Set up a center to advicse and support, without identifying, whistle-blowers. (The Japan<br />

Times, 13 July 2002).<br />

July 2003: The Nagasaki District Court ruled that a porti<strong>on</strong> of d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s made to <strong>the</strong> LDP<br />

prefectural chapter prior to February 2002 gubernatorial electi<strong>on</strong>s had violated <strong>the</strong> Public Offices<br />

Electi<strong>on</strong> Law and c<strong>on</strong>victed two former senior chapter officials. (The Japan Times: 15 Aug.<br />

2003).<br />

Aug 2003: Filed lawsuits against executives, who were related to <strong>the</strong>se d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s, Wakachiku<br />

C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> in Fukuoka, Penta-Ocean C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> in Tokyo and Kumagai Gumi in Fukui. (The<br />

Japan Times, 15 Aug 2003).<br />

Ref lecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Human</strong> C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>: Change, C<strong>on</strong>flict and Modernity<br />

The Work of <strong>the</strong> 2004/2005 API Fellows<br />

Shareholder Suit<br />

Shareholder Suit<br />

ShareholderSuit<br />

Shareholder Suit<br />

Shareholder Suit<br />

Whistleblower<br />

Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />

Shareholder Suit<br />

Note: Activities in table do not include all activities of each group. Only selected activities are menti<strong>on</strong>ed.<br />

In 1994, before <strong>the</strong> Shareholder Ombudsman was<br />

established, <strong>the</strong> civic ombudsman in Osaka filed a<br />

shareholder suit against three companies to deter<br />

political d<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The civil society group which plays a prime role in<br />

shareholder suits is <strong>the</strong> “Shareholder Ombudsman” or<br />

“Kabunushi Onbuzuman” (KO). It was founded <strong>on</strong><br />

8 January 1996 by a group of lawyers, accountants,<br />

academics, individual shareholders and o<strong>the</strong>r citizens.<br />

As menti<strong>on</strong>ed in its website, <strong>the</strong> KO’s goal is to reform<br />

or improve Japanese management practices by:<br />

1) m<strong>on</strong>itoring corporate activities and criticizing<br />

antisocial acts by corporati<strong>on</strong>s;<br />

2) exercising <strong>the</strong> legal rights of comm<strong>on</strong><br />

shareholders and using lawsuits as necessary to force<br />

disclosure;<br />

3) To introduce shareholder proposals,<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s or requests for corporate<br />

transparency, democracy, equity, social justice and<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental protecti<strong>on</strong>; and<br />

4) To praise and publicize those corporati<strong>on</strong>s that<br />

improve working c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, practice philanthropy,<br />

protect <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment, employ <strong>the</strong> handicapped,<br />

promote gender-equality, and engage in full<br />

disclosure of <strong>the</strong>ir activities.<br />

In order to check or correct improper practices in<br />

<strong>org</strong>anizati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Shareholder Ombudsman requires<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> from insiders. Therefore, whistle blowers<br />

are an important source of informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

However, in <strong>the</strong> attitude of mainstream Japanese,<br />

whistle blowers have been treated as traitors (The Japan<br />

Times, 13 Nov. 2002), snitches (The Japan Times, 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!