15.12.2012 Views

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

Reflections on the Human Condition - Api-fellowships.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of cultivated area, and populati<strong>on</strong> resettlement. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> fourth five-year development plan (1977-1981),<br />

however, due to c<strong>on</strong>tinued forest depleti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> target<br />

level for forest lands was revised to 37 percent. The<br />

same policy was also stated in <strong>the</strong> sixth (1987-1991)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> seventh (1992-1996) nati<strong>on</strong>al ec<strong>on</strong>omic and<br />

social development plan. (Pragt<strong>on</strong>g: 1993, 115)<br />

The commercializati<strong>on</strong> of timber harvesting significantly<br />

influenced <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Royal Forestry Department<br />

(RFD) and subsequent forest policy and legislati<strong>on</strong><br />

(Hafner: 1990, 79). Until <strong>the</strong> late nineteenth century,<br />

<strong>the</strong> cutting and collecti<strong>on</strong> of timber or harvesting<br />

of forest resources was, except for teak, unregulated.<br />

The RFD, <strong>the</strong> basis for modern instituti<strong>on</strong>s for forest<br />

management and policy, was created in 1898 in<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>se to c<strong>on</strong>cerns over <strong>the</strong> commercializati<strong>on</strong> of teak<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> and weak administrative and tax c<strong>on</strong>trols<br />

<strong>on</strong> teak harvesting in Thailand. The policy embodied<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Forest Preservati<strong>on</strong> Act of 1879 emphasized<br />

protecti<strong>on</strong> and management to increase producti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

supervisi<strong>on</strong> and administrati<strong>on</strong> of forest resources by<br />

<strong>the</strong> RFD, definiti<strong>on</strong> of forest rights, and <strong>the</strong> collecti<strong>on</strong><br />

of revenues and c<strong>on</strong>trol of n<strong>on</strong> teak transit. During <strong>the</strong><br />

decade following <strong>the</strong> 1932 transformati<strong>on</strong> of Thailand<br />

into a c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al m<strong>on</strong>archy, more fundamental<br />

change began to occur. The RFD was re<strong>org</strong>anized 1935<br />

to include four technical divisi<strong>on</strong>s with duties related to<br />

forest c<strong>on</strong>trol, silviculture, forest products research, and<br />

forest schools.<br />

It was regulated that <strong>the</strong> RFD had no c<strong>on</strong>trol over <strong>the</strong><br />

exploitati<strong>on</strong> of n<strong>on</strong> teak forests; however, until <strong>the</strong><br />

Forest C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Law of 1913 and <strong>the</strong> Forest Act<br />

of 1949 and <strong>the</strong> 1960 Forest Act were enacted. Legal<br />

reform began in 1936 with revisi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> existing forest<br />

acts. Permanent producti<strong>on</strong> forest reserves were first<br />

authorized <strong>the</strong> 1938 Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Reservati<strong>on</strong> Forest<br />

Act. O<strong>the</strong>r forest laws were revised in <strong>the</strong> 1941 Forest<br />

Act and its amendments in 1948 and 1951. In 1947,<br />

a separate RFD forest producti<strong>on</strong> unit known as <strong>the</strong><br />

Forest Industry Organizati<strong>on</strong> (FIO) was established. In<br />

apparent c<strong>on</strong>juncti<strong>on</strong> with those legislati<strong>on</strong>s menti<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

above, in 1954 <strong>the</strong> Forest Police and <strong>the</strong> Forest<br />

Protecti<strong>on</strong> Units firstly created within <strong>the</strong> RFD.<br />

In 1964, <strong>the</strong> Royal Thai Government passed <strong>the</strong><br />

Forest Reserve Act (FRA), establishing forest reserves<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> country. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, <strong>the</strong> milli<strong>on</strong><br />

families living within <strong>the</strong> forest reserve areas at <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time were thus classified as ‘illegal settlers’. Hence, <strong>the</strong><br />

FRA had little impact <strong>on</strong> forest protecti<strong>on</strong> because<br />

large porti<strong>on</strong>s of many forest reserves had already<br />

been encroached <strong>on</strong> by farmers in search of land and<br />

HERITAGE, IDENTITY, CHANGE AND CONFLICT<br />

forest-dependent communities, most of <strong>the</strong>m were<br />

indigenous people who live within <strong>the</strong> reserved forests<br />

for generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

In 1975, <strong>the</strong> Thai Cabinet granted amnesty to all illegal<br />

residents of nati<strong>on</strong>al reserved forests by authorizing <strong>the</strong><br />

RFD, with <strong>the</strong> intenti<strong>on</strong> of: (1) supporting nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

security policy c<strong>on</strong>cerned with suppressing community<br />

insurgency and influence, especially in areas of reserved<br />

forest, (2) c<strong>on</strong>solidating <strong>the</strong> forest resident populati<strong>on</strong><br />

in villages where <strong>the</strong>y could be better insulated from<br />

communist subversi<strong>on</strong>, (3) addressing <strong>the</strong> problems<br />

of illegal forest encroachment and degradati<strong>on</strong>, and<br />

(4) pursuing development and forest management<br />

programs c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <strong>the</strong>se c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. (Hafner:<br />

1990, 82)<br />

A sec<strong>on</strong>d Thai Cabinet decisi<strong>on</strong> in 1975 authorized<br />

<strong>the</strong> RFD to develop programs for improving <strong>the</strong><br />

management of illegally occupied and degraded forest<br />

lands. As such, <strong>the</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Forest Land Management<br />

Divisi<strong>on</strong> (NFLMD) was established within <strong>the</strong> RFD to<br />

design and implement <strong>the</strong>se programs, <strong>on</strong>e of which,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Forest Village Program (FVP). Key elements of <strong>the</strong><br />

forest village strategy include granting use rights ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than title to forest land, providing village infrastructure<br />

and services, and developing cooperative, credit, and<br />

agricultural extensi<strong>on</strong> programs. In 1979, <strong>the</strong> RFD<br />

promoted <strong>the</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Forest Land Allocati<strong>on</strong> Program<br />

(Sit Thi Thamkin/STK – right to harvest) and Land<br />

Certificate Program. These two forest land management<br />

programs grant land use rights to illegal forest residents,<br />

create permanent home settlements to prevent fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

land encroachment, and encourage reforestati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

degraded forest areas. (Chamruspanth: 1993, 89)<br />

The military government supported <strong>the</strong> centrally<br />

<strong>org</strong>anized forest village c<strong>on</strong>cept, which was extended in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Watershed Management Divisi<strong>on</strong>’s Hilltribe Forest<br />

Village Program in 1977. By 1978, this was formalized<br />

in a forest village program under <strong>the</strong> Local Development<br />

for Security Project. The Thai army launched <strong>the</strong><br />

Green Nor<strong>the</strong>ast (Isaan Khieo) project, which aims to<br />

rehabilitate envir<strong>on</strong>mental resources, raise incomes of<br />

<strong>the</strong> forest-dependent people, and improve <strong>the</strong> standard<br />

of living throughout <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> by allowing <strong>the</strong> army to<br />

facilitate and integrate programs that o<strong>the</strong>r government<br />

agencies have pursued for decades. Despite numerous<br />

efforts made by <strong>the</strong> RFD, villagers and outsiders (i.e.<br />

traders and government officers) c<strong>on</strong>tinue to encroach<br />

<strong>on</strong> forest reserves. In additi<strong>on</strong>, social problems and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>flicts have occurred am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> settlers due especially<br />

to ethnic and cultural differences. There have been few<br />

initiatives to resolve <strong>the</strong>se social and cultural as well as<br />

Ref lecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Human</strong> C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>: Change, C<strong>on</strong>flict and Modernity<br />

The Work of <strong>the</strong> 2004/2005 API Fellows<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!