04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 7<br />

MORPHOLOGY<br />

Morphology in Mono is manifested on nouns, verbs, prepositions, <strong>and</strong> a h<strong>and</strong>ful<br />

<strong>of</strong> particles. Nominal morphology involves a plural prefix on animate nouns. Verbal<br />

morphology includes (1) prefixes marking <strong>the</strong> infinitive, condition, <strong>and</strong> repetition; (2)<br />

reduplication marking negation <strong>and</strong> some tense, aspect, <strong>and</strong> mood categories; <strong>and</strong> (3)<br />

tonal morphemes which mark tense, aspect, <strong>and</strong> mood. Prepositional morphology<br />

includes prefixes which mark precisions in location. I examine <strong>the</strong> morphological<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> nouns in Section 7.1.1, verbs in Section 7.1.2, prepositions in 7.1.3, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

particles in Section 7.1.4. In addition, I discuss noun compounding <strong>and</strong> derivational<br />

processes in Section 7.1.1.<br />

Some phonological processes in Mono (such as vowel hiatus <strong>and</strong> glide formation)<br />

become evident only when we look across morpheme or word boundaries. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

processes which are known to apply within a morpheme are also applicable across<br />

morpheme or word boundaries. In Section 7.2, I discuss phonological processes<br />

exhibiting <strong>the</strong>se types <strong>of</strong> behavior.<br />

Morphological typology has been a topic <strong>of</strong> discussion in linguistics since at least<br />

<strong>the</strong> early part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century. Recently Comrie (1989: 46ff) <strong>of</strong>fered a revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional typology, in which he categorizes languages along two continua—<strong>the</strong><br />

index <strong>of</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> index <strong>of</strong> fusion.<br />

According to Comrie, <strong>the</strong> index <strong>of</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis classifies languages according to <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> morphemes a word can contain. Languages in which a word typically contains<br />

only one morpheme are termed isolating, whereas languages in which a word typically<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!