04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

end <strong>of</strong> an approximant are difficult to demarcate acoustically. However, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

instances where <strong>the</strong> distinction between <strong>the</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> secondary articulation is<br />

contrastive. For example, in Russian <strong>the</strong>re is a contrast between s’est’ [IAIJ] ‘sit down’,<br />

in which palatalization occurs simultaneously with s, <strong>and</strong> syest’ [IAIJ] ‘eat up’, in which<br />

a palatal glide follows <strong>the</strong> s in a consonant-glide cluster. Note that <strong>the</strong> s is palatalized as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following glide. However, if <strong>the</strong>re is a syllable boundary between a<br />

consonant <strong>and</strong> an ensuing palatal glide, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> consonant is not palatalized. For<br />

example, ot’éc [=JAJI] ‘fa<strong>the</strong>r’ vs. otjéxat’ [=JAN=J] ‘to go away riding’ (Bill Darden,<br />

per. comm.).<br />

The terms labialization <strong>and</strong> palatalization have been used to refer to both phonetic<br />

<strong>and</strong> phonological phenomena. In <strong>the</strong> phonetic usage, <strong>the</strong>y describe certain types <strong>of</strong><br />

secondary articulations, as discussed above. Labialization refers to <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> a lip<br />

rounding gesture (Ladefoged & Maddieson note that in most cases, <strong>the</strong>re is an<br />

accompanying raising <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tongue as well), <strong>and</strong> palatalization refers to <strong>the</strong><br />

addition <strong>of</strong> a high front tongue position (i.e. [i]). For example, Russian contrasts <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>and</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> palatalization on certain segments: [HB] ‘ro<strong>of</strong>’ vs. [HB]<br />

‘blood’ (Ladefoged 1982: 210). Pohnpeian contrasts <strong>the</strong> presence or absence <strong>of</strong><br />

labialization on certain segments: [=F] ‘bundle’ [=F9] ‘new’ (Ladefoged & Maddieson,<br />

p. 360)<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terms concerns phonological alternations in which <strong>the</strong><br />

primary articulation itself is modified. For example, English I is said to be “palatalized”<br />

when it becomes 5, such as in <strong>the</strong> change from press to pressure. Also, <strong>the</strong> phoneme k is<br />

said to be “palatalized” in English when it precedes a front vowel, as in [0E] ‘key’<br />

versus [0)] ‘car’.<br />

When I use <strong>the</strong> terms labialization, palatalization, <strong>and</strong> secondary articulation in<br />

discussing Mono, I am referring specifically to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> lip rounding or front<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!