04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

study informing <strong>the</strong> internal classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Central Core languages remains to be<br />

conducted.<br />

It is also unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> different subgroups within <strong>the</strong> Central Core consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> speech varieties which are indeed mutually unintelligible. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, can each<br />

node under Central Core be considered a separate language, or is it better to speak <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Central Core as being a single language with six major dialectal variants? One possible<br />

means <strong>of</strong> testing this is <strong>the</strong> Recorded Text Test (RTT, Casad 1974). In <strong>the</strong> RTT, texts are<br />

recorded in several related speech varieties. These texts are <strong>the</strong>n played for speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r speech varieties <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subjects are graded for <strong>the</strong>ir level <strong>of</strong> comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />

each text. Of course, care must be taken to insure that <strong>the</strong> test is in fact measuring<br />

inherent intelligibility <strong>and</strong> not learned intelligibility.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> mid 1990’s, researchers with <strong>SIL</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association Centrafricaine pour<br />

la Traduction de la Bible et l’Alphabetisation (ACATBA) in CAR conducted language<br />

surveys in Linda (Blühberger 1996), Yakpa (Moehama 1994), Togbo (Buchanan 1996),<br />

Yangere (Moehama 1995), <strong>and</strong> Ngbugu (Kieschke 1993). The first four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se surveys<br />

conducted a “rapid appraisal” RTT, a simplified form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test in which an evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> intelligibility is made by playing a text from a related speech variety for a group <strong>of</strong><br />

people (ra<strong>the</strong>r than for individuals) who speak a language variety. The group is <strong>the</strong>n<br />

evaluated as having one <strong>of</strong> three levels: (1) good intelligibility, (2) some intelligibility, or<br />

(3) no intelligibility. For <strong>the</strong> surveys conducted, <strong>the</strong> following scores were obtained:<br />

Table 1.2: Levels <strong>of</strong> intelligibility between B<strong>and</strong>a speech varieties<br />

Linda Mbre Ndele Mono Togbo Togbo Vara Ngbugu Mbanza Dakpa<br />

(CAR) (DRC)<br />

Linda 2(+/-) 3(+)<br />

Yakpa 1- 1(-) 3<br />

Togbo<br />

(CAR)<br />

1 2 1 1- 1 1 3 2<br />

Yangere 1 1 1- 1 1- 3 3 3<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!