04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ngbugu (interspersed with Ngb<strong>and</strong>i west <strong>of</strong> Mobayi). All population statistics are from<br />

Fultz & Morgan except where noted. Two or three villages east <strong>of</strong> P<strong>and</strong>u in <strong>the</strong> main<br />

Gobu region speak a language called Ngbulu which may belong to <strong>the</strong> B<strong>and</strong>a group, but<br />

survey needs to be done to clarify this. Cloarec-Heiss (1988) lists Kpala as a B<strong>and</strong>a<br />

language, but Fultz & Morgan note that it is in fact related to Ngbaka-Ma’bo. There is no<br />

present-day evidence that <strong>the</strong> B<strong>and</strong>a dialects Gbi, Kpagua, or Ngundu are spoken in D. R.<br />

Congo, contrary to what is listed in Grimes (1996).<br />

The Bili dialect <strong>of</strong> Mono appears to be <strong>the</strong> dominant dialect. It has a larger<br />

population than all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Mono groups combined. In addition, it has <strong>the</strong> most<br />

prestige <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> Mono dialects. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r groups hold a positive attitude toward<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bili dialect.<br />

1.2 Classification<br />

Linguistic researchers have consistently classified Mono as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> B<strong>and</strong>a<br />

language group (see, e.g., Tisserant 1930: 5 <strong>and</strong> Tucker & Bryan 1956: 33), an ethnically<br />

homogenous yet linguistically diverse group with perhaps as many as 50 speech varieties<br />

(Cloarec-Heiss 1988). B<strong>and</strong>a is generally considered to be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ubangi branch <strong>of</strong><br />

Adamawa-Ubangi, itself a branch <strong>of</strong> Greenberg’s (1970) Niger-Congo phylum.<br />

In this section, I will discuss in detail <strong>the</strong> internal classification <strong>of</strong> B<strong>and</strong>a. For <strong>the</strong><br />

interested reader, Appendix C <strong>of</strong>fers an evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> presently accepted status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Niger-Congo family, including a detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> external <strong>and</strong> internal<br />

relationships <strong>of</strong> Adamawa-Ubangi. Here, I provide just a few remarks highlighting <strong>the</strong><br />

major conclusions <strong>of</strong> Appendix C with respect to Adamawa-Ubangi.<br />

The most widely accepted procedure for establishing <strong>the</strong> classification <strong>of</strong> a<br />

language family is to reconstruct proto forms <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n describe <strong>the</strong> systematic changes<br />

resulting in <strong>the</strong> present-day forms by use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative method. Classifications<br />

based on o<strong>the</strong>r evidence, such as typological features or cognate percentages, are less<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!