04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial flap bears a partial resemblance to that <strong>of</strong> labial-velar stops.<br />

Besides <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial flap in sou<strong>the</strong>astern Africa, which can be accounted<br />

for by migration patterns as discussed in Section D.2, <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial flap is<br />

wholly subsumed within that <strong>of</strong> labial-velar stops. In addition, Boyd (1974: 51, 82-3)<br />

identifies sound correspondences between labial-velar stops <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> labial flap in <strong>the</strong><br />

Adamawa group, given in (12). He consequently posits <strong>the</strong> sound change *C> C> C> > L (p. 55).<br />

Our tentative hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, <strong>the</strong>n, is that <strong>the</strong> labial flap arose as a sound change from a<br />

labial-velar stop in Adamawa-Ubangi.<br />

(12) Sound correspondences between C> C> <strong>and</strong> L in Adamawa (Boyd 1974)<br />

‘hit’ ‘throw’ ‘scratch’<br />

Ndai [GKE] C>= C>= C>= C>= C>K C>K C>K C>=C>K C>=C>K C>=C>K C>=C>K<br />

Dama [DMM] C>=H C>=H<br />

C>= C>=<br />

C>=<br />

Pana [PNZ] C>KA C>KA C>KA C>KA C> C> C> C> FKKA FKKA FKKA FKKA<br />

Pam [PMN], Mono [MRU] C>=H C>=H<br />

F= F= F= F=<br />

Kuo C>K C>K F= F= F= F=<br />

Dii C> C> C> C> C>L( C>L( C>L( C>L( F F F F<br />

Karang L= L= LK LK LK C>= C>= C>= C>=<br />

Nzakmbay L= L= LK LK LK C>= C>= C>= C>=<br />

Kare L= L= LK LK LK C>= C>=<br />

C>=<br />

Mbum L= L= L= LK LK LK >== >== >== >==<br />

Note that <strong>the</strong>re are no lexical items where C> C> is attested in cognates in all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

languages under consideration. The closest is <strong>the</strong> lexical item for ‘scratch’, shown in (12).<br />

It is interesting to note that this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> a Niger-Congo origin for <strong>the</strong> labial<br />

flap accords with a hypo<strong>the</strong>sis set forth in Greenberg (1959, 1983). He notes that many<br />

features unique (or almost unique) to Africa can be found in a large central area <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />

which includes Niger-Congo, Songhai, Central Sudanic, <strong>and</strong> Chadic. In examining four<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se features—labial-velar stops, <strong>the</strong> labial flap, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verb ‘to surpass’ to<br />

mark <strong>the</strong> comparative, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a single term to indicate both ‘animal’ <strong>and</strong> ‘meat’—<br />

he traces <strong>the</strong>m all back to a Niger-Congo origin, except for <strong>the</strong> labial flap, for which he<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!