04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Williamson bases much <strong>of</strong> her classification on Bennett & Sterk (1977). Bennett<br />

& Sterk’s study consists <strong>of</strong> two parts. First, <strong>the</strong>y set up <strong>the</strong> gross subgroupings <strong>of</strong> Niger-<br />

Congo using lexicostatistical percentages. They analyze an 87-item word list in 50<br />

languages, <strong>and</strong> examine data from previous studies. Second, <strong>the</strong>y look more closely at <strong>the</strong><br />

question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relatedness <strong>of</strong> Kwa <strong>and</strong> Benue-Congo. For this portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

analyze lexicostatistical percentages for a 145-item word list in 150 languages. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong>y try to support each subgrouping by identifying shared lexical <strong>and</strong><br />

phonological innovations. I will look at <strong>the</strong> second part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir study in detail in Section<br />

C.2. Here, I will briefly examine Williamson’s classification, starting with <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

units <strong>and</strong> working to <strong>the</strong> right on <strong>the</strong> chart.<br />

Greenberg includes M<strong>and</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Atlantic-Congo within Niger-Congo, but excludes<br />

Kord<strong>of</strong>anian. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Williamson follows Bennett & Sterk in proposing a<br />

three way split between <strong>the</strong> three branches. Her reasons are tw<strong>of</strong>old: (1) Bennett & Sterk<br />

find that M<strong>and</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Kord<strong>of</strong>anian have only a few lexical similarities with Atlantic-<br />

Congo, <strong>and</strong> (2) Schadeberg (1981, cf. Williamson 1989a) shows that in one case Atlantic-<br />

Congo is closer to Kord<strong>of</strong>anian than to M<strong>and</strong>e in that <strong>the</strong> Kord<strong>of</strong>anian noun class system<br />

shows systematic resemblance to Atlantic-Congo, whereas M<strong>and</strong>e has no noun class<br />

system. Williamson concludes that M<strong>and</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Kord<strong>of</strong>anian both split from <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong><br />

Niger-Congo at an early date, but that <strong>the</strong> split was not necessarily simultaneous.<br />

Next, Williamson makes a subsequent split under Atlantic-Congo between Ijoid,<br />

Atlantic, <strong>and</strong> Volta-Congo 2 . The split between Atlantic <strong>and</strong> Volta-Congo is based on<br />

Bennett & Sterk’s lexicostatistical percentages. In fact, <strong>the</strong>ir percentages suggest that <strong>the</strong><br />

three sub-branches <strong>of</strong> Atlantic are so divergent that <strong>the</strong>y are probably each coordinate<br />

branches with Volta-Congo. Williamson leaves this an open question. The placement <strong>of</strong><br />

Ijoid at this level is more tentative. Greenberg places Ijoid within Kwa, but according to<br />

2 The term Volta-Congo was coined by John Stewart; cf. Stewart (1976).<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!