04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One additional construction needs to be examined before leaving <strong>the</strong> topic <strong>of</strong><br />

noun compounding. In Mono, a <strong>the</strong>re are a large number <strong>of</strong> agentive nouns (Cloarec-<br />

Heiss, p. 134, refers to <strong>the</strong>m as noms d’agent), consisting <strong>of</strong> = = = = <br />

<br />

‘person, owner’ plus a<br />

noun or infinitive verb (14). The form = = = = <br />

<br />

is a truncation <strong>of</strong> =AC =AC =AC =AC ‘person, owner’. 4 In<br />

some cases, <strong>the</strong>re is variation between <strong>the</strong> two, e.g. = = = = =M= =M= =M= =M= ~ =AC =AC =AC =AC =M= =M= =M= =M= ‘servant,<br />

employee’.<br />

(14) Sample agentive nouns<br />

=C =C =C =C ‘inhabitant’ < = = = = <br />

<br />

‘person’ + C C C C ‘village’<br />

= = = = =C>= =C>= =C>= =C>= ~ =AC =AC =AC =AC =C>= =C>= =C>= =C>= ‘thief’<br />

= = = = =( =( =( =( ‘thumb’<br />

= = = = > > JK JK JK JK ‘deaf person’<br />

= = = = =CAA =CAA =CAA =CAA ‘host’<br />

= = = = ==5A ==5A ==5A ==5A > > 5= 5= 5= 5= ‘polygamist’<br />

= = = = K(MKI(<br />

K(MKI( K(MKI(<br />

K(MKI( ‘wise person’<br />

= = = = (@ (@ (@ (@ @ @ @ @ ‘farmer’<br />

This process is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> an agentive construction in English in which <strong>the</strong><br />

morpheme man is suffixed to a noun (e.g. milkman, postman, congressman).<br />

Agentive nouns in Mono share some properties with compounds. First, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same form as <strong>the</strong> associative noun phrase, with <strong>the</strong> head being <strong>the</strong> first element.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>re is formal reduction, since =AC =AC =AC =AC becomes = = = = .<br />

<br />

Third, <strong>the</strong>re can be semantic<br />

restriction, e.g. = = = = =( =( =( =( ‘thumb (lit: person <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>)’. Fourth, <strong>the</strong>re is phonological<br />

modification in that <strong>the</strong> A <strong>of</strong> =AC =AC =AC =AC becomes E in = = = = .<br />

<br />

It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r = = = = <br />

should be considered a separate word or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

compound has truly become fused. It is a bound morpheme which must occur with a<br />

following element, whereas =AC =AC =AC =AC is a free morpheme. However, when <strong>the</strong> following<br />

4<br />

Cloarec-Heiss (p. 135) states that in Linda <strong>the</strong> agentive form comes from <strong>the</strong> word A A A A <br />

<br />

‘mo<strong>the</strong>r’.<br />

There is indeed formal identity between <strong>the</strong> two words in Linda (<strong>and</strong> in Mono as well), but <strong>the</strong> source in<br />

Mono <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agentive form is clearly =AC =AC =AC =AC ‘person, owner’, based on examples such as = = = = =M= =M= =M= =M= ~<br />

=AC =AC =AC =AC =M= =M= =M= =M= ‘servant, employee’ where <strong>the</strong>re is variation between <strong>the</strong> two, as well as native speaker<br />

intuitions about <strong>the</strong> source.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!