04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, this is not what we find. Instead, <strong>the</strong> M tone skips <strong>the</strong> secondary<br />

articulation <strong>and</strong> lodges on <strong>the</strong> = instead. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> secondary articulation is<br />

transparent to <strong>the</strong> tone patterns, <strong>and</strong> so it is best to interpret it as not bearing tone.<br />

The two secondary articulations have a limited distribution in <strong>the</strong> syllable. Both<br />

are attested following <strong>the</strong> velar <strong>and</strong> glottal consonants: , C, C C, C C , <strong>and</strong> D. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />

palatal <strong>of</strong>f-glide is attested following in two lexical items, MK= MK= MK= MK= ‘giraffe’ <strong>and</strong> C>=== C>=== C>=== C>===<br />

‘November’, <strong>and</strong> following in one lexical item, (= (= (= (= ‘to shake’. Also, <strong>the</strong> marginal<br />

phoneme could be interpreted as <strong>the</strong> sequence + , as mentioned in Section 2.1.3, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is more evidence for <strong>the</strong> phonemic status <strong>of</strong> than for or . It occurs in more<br />

lexical items, <strong>and</strong> it is found in both word-initial <strong>and</strong> word-medial position. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

its interpretation as a phoneme is tentative.<br />

Two observations concerning <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> labialization <strong>and</strong> palatalization<br />

are worth noting. First, Ladefoged & Maddieson (p. 356) note that cross-linguistically<br />

labialization most commonly co-occurs with velar obstruents. This generalization holds<br />

for Mono as well. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Ladefoged & Maddieson note that <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

secondary articulations, it is labialization which usually co-occurs with <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> segments (p. 356). In Mono, we see that palatalization lays<br />

claim to this, since it co-occurs with l <strong>and</strong> (<strong>and</strong> depending on how is interpreted) in<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong> velar <strong>and</strong> glottal consonants.<br />

Within a morpheme, <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-glides are nearly always followed by <strong>the</strong> vowel a.<br />

The only exceptions to this are ei<strong>the</strong>r in ideophones (CAH CAH CAH CAH ‘sound <strong>of</strong> a bell’ <strong>and</strong><br />

DM DM = = = = ‘hot’) or body parts (=( =( =( =( ‘ho<strong>of</strong>’). The secondary articulations do not immediately<br />

follow labial-velar consonants, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y do not combine with each o<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

syllable. The examples in my corpus are:<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!