04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y Hubbard, <strong>the</strong>n this is evidence that Mono NC sequences should be interpreted as<br />

single segments ra<strong>the</strong>r than N + C clusters.<br />

Table 8.2: Closure duration <strong>of</strong> prenasalized stops in Mono (Speaker K). Tokens taken<br />

from cons2_11025.wav. Time is in seconds.<br />

Plain stops Prenasalized stops<br />

aba2a 0.152 amba2a 0.177<br />

aba2b 0.174 amba2b 0.204<br />

aba2c 0.150 amba2c 0.175<br />

ada2a 0.129 <strong>and</strong>a2a 0.141<br />

ada2b 0.128 <strong>and</strong>a2b 0.135<br />

ada2c 0.117 <strong>and</strong>a2c 0.123<br />

aga2a 0.139 anga2a 0.157<br />

aga2b 0.143 anga2b 0.135<br />

aga2c 0.138 anga2c 0.133<br />

agba2a 0.171 angba2a 0.176<br />

agba2b 0.152 angba2b 0.187<br />

agba2c 0.166 angba2c 0.169<br />

8.2 Vowels<br />

8.2.1 Vowel space<br />

Mean 0.147 0.159<br />

SD 0.0172 0.0246<br />

In this section, I examine <strong>the</strong> acoustic properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mono vowel space. Since<br />

even within its own language family <strong>the</strong> Mono vowel system is typologically rare due to<br />

<strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> a front lower mid vowel -, it is important to document its acoustic<br />

characteristics in more detail.<br />

Since Peterson <strong>and</strong> Barney (1952), vowels have typically been plotted according<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir first two formants (or resonances), F1 <strong>and</strong> F2. O<strong>the</strong>rs have modified this basic<br />

classification for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons. Ladefoged (1982) suggests charting F1 vs. F2 – F1<br />

because “There is a better correlation between <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> backness <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> distance<br />

between <strong>the</strong> first two formants.” (p. 179). Liljencrants & Lindblom (1972) <strong>and</strong> Fant<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!