04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table F.4, continued.<br />

> Spec 532.86 1036.92 2534.69 3499.6<br />

(2) LPC 595.05 967.11 2543.61 3477.23 141.42 150.76 134.6 27.88<br />

FFT 550 925 2525 3475<br />

Spec 524.66 935.88 2041.93 3247.23<br />

(1) LPC 564.05 961.72 2077.07 3232.1 85.26 80.54 51.71 35.72<br />

‘termite’ FFT 550 900 2100 3250<br />

Spec 510.48 992.6 2169.55 3374.86<br />

(2) LPC 542.03 990.03 2169.03 3388.99 98.5 112.12 98.72 19.16<br />

FFT 550 950 2150 3375<br />

> Spec 510.48 935.88 2453.15 3403.22<br />

(1) LPC 539.35 925.67 2494.6 3477.86 82.41 48.5 107.91 15.5<br />

‘sunrise’ FFT 550 900 2450 3475<br />

Note: The actual value <strong>of</strong> F3 given by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm is 1891.11 Hz with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong><br />

257.38 Hz. The values <strong>of</strong> F3 <strong>and</strong> BW3 given above are actually F4 <strong>and</strong> BW4, respectively, as<br />

calculated by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm. The number <strong>of</strong> poles employed in <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm was 14.<br />

> Spec 538.84 935.88 2552.41 3431.58<br />

(2) LPC 553.83 942.17 2627.22 3450.62 111.85 69.26 81.02 24.71<br />

FFT 550 875 2600 3425<br />

Note: The actual value <strong>of</strong> F3 given by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm is 1958.99 Hz with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong><br />

1008.73 Hz. The values <strong>of</strong> F3 <strong>and</strong> BW3 given above are actually F4 <strong>and</strong> BW4, respectively, as<br />

calculated by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm. The number <strong>of</strong> poles employed in <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm was 14.<br />

@ Spec 510.48 1020.96 2382.25 3459.94<br />

(1) LPC 535.85 1023.9 2421.93 3483.49 77.33 70.06 121.08 34.04<br />

‘flower’ FFT 550 975 2425 3450<br />

@ Spec 482.12 1020.96 2396.43 3488.3<br />

(2) LPC 506.99 1014.9 2389.88 3474.11 44.59 38.33 112.5 51.33<br />

FFT 500 1000 2400 3450<br />

C( Spec 652.28 1162.77 2339.71 3530.84<br />

(1) LPC 586.86 919.95 2412.94 3558.12 80.4 134.21 66.18 35.89<br />

‘fish trap’ FFT 600 1075 2400 3550<br />

Note: The actual value <strong>of</strong> F3 given by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm is 1786.87 Hz with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong><br />

296.84 Hz. The values <strong>of</strong> F3 <strong>and</strong> BW3 given above are actually F4 <strong>and</strong> BW4, respectively, as<br />

calculated by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm. The number <strong>of</strong> poles employed in <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm was 14.<br />

C( Spec 581.38 1106.05 2467.33 3445.76<br />

(2) LPC 549.31 981.81 2533.5 3470.05 66.11 124.49 91.26 49.85<br />

FFT 525 1075 2500 3475<br />

Note: The actual value <strong>of</strong> F3 given by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm is 1762.21 Hz with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong><br />

374.07 Hz. The values <strong>of</strong> F3 <strong>and</strong> BW3 given above are actually F4 <strong>and</strong> BW4, respectively, as<br />

calculated by <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm. The number <strong>of</strong> poles employed in <strong>the</strong> LPC algorithm was 14.<br />

349

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!