04.03.2013 Views

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

the university of chicago the phonology and ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in that <strong>the</strong>y most <strong>of</strong>ten come about through semantic shift. Since this process may occur<br />

repeatedly <strong>and</strong> independently, it is not fully reliable.”<br />

In addition, in this study we have seen how <strong>the</strong>re can be confusion between<br />

isoglosses <strong>and</strong> innovations. An isogloss indicates a linguistic boundary, but this may not<br />

necessarily indicate that <strong>the</strong> opposing words both represent innovations at <strong>the</strong> same<br />

genetic level.<br />

4. The comparative method. The comparative method has been traditionally<br />

considered <strong>the</strong> most accurate means by which to establish <strong>the</strong> genetic relationships<br />

between languages. The method involves comparing lexical items <strong>and</strong> grammatical forms<br />

between languages, setting up correspondences between <strong>the</strong> phonemes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n making hypo<strong>the</strong>ses about <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proto-language <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound laws<br />

which led to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present-day languages in <strong>the</strong> family.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative method has been neglected in Niger-Congo<br />

classification. It has been used on a micro level to establish <strong>the</strong> genetic relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

certain subgroups within Niger-Congo, e.g. Bantu, but to date <strong>the</strong>re has been no<br />

concerted effort to establish a proto-system for Niger-Congo as a whole, along with <strong>the</strong><br />

sound laws which led to <strong>the</strong> modern languages in <strong>the</strong> family. Dixon (1997: 32-35) does<br />

not mince words in criticizing <strong>the</strong> Africanists for this, but to <strong>the</strong>ir credit, <strong>the</strong> Africanists<br />

have stated all along <strong>the</strong> tentative nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir conclusions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative method to verify <strong>the</strong>ir findings.<br />

Dixon (1997) points out that <strong>the</strong>re are certain problems associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

comparative method. First, it cannot be used blindly as a discovery procedure to<br />

mechanically produce a reconstruction. Dixon provides a couple <strong>of</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>tical<br />

examples to illustrate this point. Second, he quotes Bloomfield (1933), who states:<br />

The comparative method, <strong>the</strong>n—our only method for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />

prehistoric language—would work accurately for absolutely uniform speechcommunities<br />

<strong>and</strong> sudden, sharp cleavages. Since <strong>the</strong>se presuppositions are never<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!