01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other verbs we will consi<strong>de</strong>r below) are the only verbs with no apparent I-subject. So it seems<br />

reasonable not to give up our hypothesis and try to find a specific explanation for the behavior of<br />

semblar.<br />

Suppose we assume that semblar, like weather and similar verbs, has a quasi-Argument,<br />

which is the subject in the problematic examples. 55 At first glance, this position does not seem<br />

tenable: if the quasi-Argument is present with semblar + CP, it would block raising in the<br />

semblar + IP construction, since two Arguments (the quasi-Argument and the raising Argument)<br />

would be competing to coin<strong>de</strong>x with AGR and become subjects of the main clause. On the other<br />

hand, if a theory of quasi-Arguments is to be taken seriously, we cannot assume that the quasi-<br />

Argument is optional and does not appear in the raising construction: quasi-Arguments should be<br />

subject to the Projection Principle and the Theta-Criterion: otherwise they would be nothing but<br />

a theoretical artifact used for our convenience.<br />

The solution to this puzzle that we propose is based on the following assumptions: there<br />

are two verbs semblar, one projecting a quasi-Argument and one not projecting it, the second<br />

one being the one allowing raising. 56 We will see that this distinction is plausible and makes the<br />

correct predictions.<br />

I think that the existence of two verbs semblar can be in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly motivated on both<br />

semantic and syntactic grounds. Consi<strong>de</strong>r the following pair in Catalan:<br />

55 Recall that the existence of quasi-Arguments is crucial<br />

for our account: without quasi-Arguments, all weather verbs<br />

would be problematic.<br />

56 Hernanz (1982) arrives at a closely similar conclusion for<br />

the Spanish equivalent of semblar (parecer), which behaves<br />

exactly like semblar, as far as I know. Her arguments are based<br />

on essentially the same motivation, except that she does not<br />

face the problem of I-subjects and Burzio's Generalization. So,<br />

she does not consi<strong>de</strong>r the possibility of a quasi-Argument. Other<br />

differences will be pointed out later.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!