01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for Occitan, it is certainly better behaved in this connection: as we saw in 0/0, IOS are (rather)<br />

constructed with preverbal subjects. As far as I know, IOS's with inverted subjects are marginal.<br />

Now let us address question 0.b): what licences (referential) pro in IOS-INV? We have<br />

assumed, in the spirit of Rizzi (1986), that pro requires recovery of content. I think it would be<br />

senseless to assume that an abstract AGR can recover the content of pro, for this would void the<br />

traditional intuition that pro is allowed as far as its content is overtly expressed in a head.<br />

The solution we will propose is similar in spirit to the one we have proposed for<br />

Nominative assignment in the absence of AGR. The i<strong>de</strong>a is that:<br />

(78) AGR, if present in a clause, must be rich enough to licence an empty I-subject (which<br />

will be [±anaphoric] <strong>de</strong>pending on the (non) Null Subject status of the language).<br />

0 is a concise expression of what we have assumed thus far for AGR-licensing, except<br />

that we did not consi<strong>de</strong>r the possibility of AGR being absent. If it is absent in IOS-INV in a NSL,<br />

then the null I-subject being [-anaphoric] (pro) will not be required to be i<strong>de</strong>ntified by AGR, and<br />

some other <strong>de</strong>vice (such as context recovery) takes place.<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a advanced here about 'free' pro is obviously a simplification: we cannot account<br />

for why pro can be fully referential in some IOS-INV (e.g., Catalan and Spanish prepositional<br />

infinitives) and only arbitrary in others (e.g., Sardinian non-controlled complements). A<br />

comprehensive account should even account for cases of null objects (if they are in<strong>de</strong>ed pro, as<br />

in Rizzi's (1986) proposal about Romance).<br />

I think the account for the referentiality of 'free' pro should be expected to be <strong>de</strong>rived<br />

from in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt modules concerning context recovery (referential pro) and unselective Binding<br />

by sentence operators (arbitrary pro -and PRO), which should interact to allow only the attested<br />

cases. 145<br />

145 See Authier (1991) for an account of Romance null objects<br />

in terms of unselective binding.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!