01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to such a conflict, subject inversion will be alright with them. I think this prediction is fulfilled.<br />

First of all, suppose we add a <strong>de</strong>gree adverb to a predicate such as 'intelligent' ('more/less<br />

intelligent'): the modified predicate will more easily allow a Focus interpretation for its subject,<br />

because it is the case that somebody is exhaustively the person who 'is more intelligent than<br />

others belonging to some discourse-<strong>de</strong>termined set of people'. So subject inversion is quite<br />

natural in this case:<br />

(19) a. És més intel.ligent en Joan<br />

Is more intelligent the Joan<br />

b. És menys perillosa la dinamita<br />

Is less dangerous the dynamite<br />

On the other hand, individual-level predicate copulative constructions with inverted<br />

subject improve if we make the exhaustive reading linguistically more explicit, as in 0:<br />

(20) a. Només és intel.ligent en Joan<br />

Only is intelligent the Joan<br />

'Only Joan is intelligent'<br />

b. De nosaltres, només és <strong>de</strong> Barcelona en Joan<br />

Of us only is from Barcelona the Joan<br />

'Out of us, only Joan is from Barcelona'<br />

c. En aquest llibre, només és interessant el pròleg<br />

In this book only is interesting the preface<br />

'In this book, only the preface is interesting'<br />

So I will assume that individual level predicates do not exclu<strong>de</strong> subject inversion in<br />

principle. What exclu<strong>de</strong>s some of the constructions is the in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt fact that the inverted<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!