01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A piece of support for the above hypothesis is the fact that, in English, when we have two<br />

objects, it is the first object which is coin<strong>de</strong>xed with AGR in a passive. We can assume, with<br />

Larson (1988), that the first object is higher than the second, the evi<strong>de</strong>nce being that there is<br />

asymmetrical c-command from the first to the second (as adduced by Larson).<br />

The general i<strong>de</strong>a is, then, that the Argument becoming the I-subject is always the most<br />

prominent available DP or CP in the c-command domain of AGR. In other words, Burzio's<br />

Generalization is <strong>de</strong>finable on purely structural terms, without making reference to Theta<br />

Theory: the fact that the presence of a projected external θ-role is relevant is due to the<br />

in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly assumed fact that the EA is projected in a more prominent position.<br />

0 expresses the i<strong>de</strong>a that it is not DP's that are forced to move to Spec of AGR to get<br />

Case, but rather AGR that is forced to pick up a DP to coin<strong>de</strong>x with it. An implicit assumption,<br />

up to now, is that I-subjects have to end up being assigned Case as subjects (i.e., being for<br />

instance Nominative in finite sentences). We will elaborate on this issue later. If we assume, for<br />

the moment, that Accusative assignment is optional, then BG is <strong>de</strong>rived from Case theory: if the<br />

I-subject is forced to be assigned Case as subject, an object that becomes an I-subject will not be<br />

able to receive Accusative, in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly of whether Accusative is available or not.<br />

0 is, on the other hand, an abstract alternative characterization of the EPP, in that it states<br />

that AGR is always coin<strong>de</strong>xed with some I-subject. In the next paragraph we will qualify this<br />

generalization by consi<strong>de</strong>ring languages where AGR is not always coin<strong>de</strong>xed with an Argument.<br />

1.2. Two Parameters<br />

In this section we will <strong>de</strong>al with two types of languages where the above formulation of<br />

the EPP does not work. In one case (German impersonal verbs and impersonal passives) we need<br />

a minor parameterization of our formulation. In the other case (Ergative languages) the<br />

parameterization affects the basic shape of the principle.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!