01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(83) a. PRO estant malalt, a en Joani, l'anirem a veure<br />

being ill to the J. him-we'll-go to see<br />

'Since he's ill, we'll visit Joan'<br />

b. PRO estant malalt, l'anirem a veure<br />

being ill him-we'll-go to see<br />

'Since he's ill, we'll visit him'<br />

c. ?*PRO estant malalt, anirem a veure EN JOAN<br />

being ill we'll-go to see the J.<br />

'*Since he's ill, we'll visit JOAN'<br />

Both 0.a) and (b.) cluster together as opposed to the non-dislocated Focus object, which<br />

triggers WCO. The only difference between this paradigm and Rizzi's paradigm is that the<br />

object, as opposed to the postverbal subject, need not be Focus (so that 0.c) improves if en Joan<br />

is not Focus.<br />

So the paradigm adduced by Rizzi proves irrelevant for the position of null subjects: in<br />

0.b) we could not claim there is a preverbal empty object c-commanding the gerund.<br />

In fact there are cases where pre-verbal subjects have co-reference restrictions which do<br />

not cluster with null subjects. Consi<strong>de</strong>r:<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!