01.05.2013 Views

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

Jaume Solà i Pujols - Departament de Filologia Catalana ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1<br />

Introduction<br />

The present thesis is conceived within the Principles and Parameters framework. 1 It is an<br />

attempt to explore an alternative hypothesis to some standard assumptions within this<br />

framework, basically concerning sentence subjecthood and the Null Subject phenomenon.<br />

Since a good <strong>de</strong>al of hypotheses in recent years are based on assumptions we challenge<br />

here (especially concerning null expletives in subject inversion structures), and since the<br />

consequences of the alternative view we will propose are far-reaching, I cannot by any means<br />

commit myself to provi<strong>de</strong> an a<strong>de</strong>quate answer to many of the questions that could naturally be<br />

posed to the proposals I will advance. I<strong>de</strong>ally, a new hypothesis has to cover all the relevant data<br />

covered by previous hypotheses and possibly some more, and has to face less problems. But it is<br />

also legitimate to draw back to challenge some basic premises, even if, by doing so, some data<br />

that previous theories could handle fall now out of the predictions. This is what happened, for<br />

instance, in generative linguistics when specific rules were abandoned in favor more principled<br />

accounts during the 1970's.<br />

So, for instance, the present thesis has little to say about Nominative assignment in<br />

contexts of INFL-to-COMP. 2 My opinion is that i<strong>de</strong>ally the theory should say little about it,<br />

because INFL-to-COMP should be orthogonal to Nominative assignment. But actually some<br />

facts (especially concerning the V-2 phenomenon) seem to suggest that subjects have a special<br />

1 See Chomsky (1986-b) for a review of some essential<br />

contentions specific to the framework, although the spirit of<br />

the framework can be traced back to the early 1980's (Chomsky<br />

(1981)).<br />

2 This has been a fruitful topic of <strong>de</strong>bate in recent<br />

proposals by Rizzi & Roberts (1989), Rizzi (1991-a), and Roberts<br />

(1991-a).<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!