closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

well as the collective significance of other related non-compliances, is determined. If the P AM
screen considers a programmatic deficiency to be a potential concern, the Condition of the
program should also be reviewed against this AT3 to determine whether there is a potential for an
Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ).
Data related to issues identified and reported through the Site Corrective Action Process
or other approved alternative deficiency and corrective action tracking systems are analyzed and
trending is performed in accordance with the Data Analysis and Trending for Performance
Improvement, procedure 1-E93-ADM-16.18 (Ref. 8). High significance issues, and any other
issues a responsible manager identifks, will have a formal cause analysis performed in
accordance will the Cause Analysis Requirements Mmal, MAN-O6ZCAUSE ANALYSIS
(Ref. 9). The results of this analysis should include corrective actions that may require
modifications to this AB. Any modifications to this AB will be managed in accordance with the
Nuclear Safety Mmal, 1 -MAN-OI 8-NSM (Ref. 10).
These programs and processes require DOE notification for significant individual issues
and notification for cases where potential or confirmed programmatic deficiencies exist
Notification of DOE may OCCUT through various channels depending on the program or process
that was being followed when an issue was identified. E the issue is determined to have
significance with respect to this AB, additional notification to DOE specifically identifying the
AB issue is required as well.
3.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT
The Building 991 Complex implements Integrated Safety Management (ISM) by the
systematic integration of safety and environmental standardshquirements into the work
planning and execution processes. This systematic integration of safety and environmental
considerations into all complex activities results in the successfi~I accomplishment of the
activities while protecting the workers, the public, and the environment. The SMPs described in
this chapter provide the necessary programmatic infrastructure and formalized'discipline to meet
the primary goal of ISM - "DO WORK SAFELY". Complex management requires specific
activities to ensure work is performed safely. These activities include definition of work scope,
identifying and analyzing hazards; development and implementation of operational contro Is,
performance of work or operation; and feedback and improvement.
Defintion of any given scope of work is accomplished predominately through the Work
Control and Maintenance programs. The engineering documentation defines the technical work
scope for any given maintenance activity, and the Integrated Work Control Program (IWCP)
work package or operating procedures define the specific planned work scope. Chapter 1 of this
FSAR identifies the activities authorized for planning or performance in the Building 991
Complex.
The identification and analysis of hazards involved in a work scope primarily falls within
the domain of the Safety and Industrial Hygiene; Radiation Protection; Nuclear Safety,
Criticality Safety, Fire Protection, and Work Control programs. The IWCP process defines the
Revision
Scptcmher I999
3-3 Building 991 Complex FSAR
.