17.06.2013 Views

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

5. SAFETY STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to identify and classify those structures, systems, and<br />

components (SSCs) that ensure the functions necessary for safe facility operation. The<br />

preventive and mitigative safety features necessary to protect the maximum [exposed] <strong>of</strong>f-site<br />

individual (MOI), the collocated worker (CW), the immediate worker (W), and the<br />

environment, or to provide significant defense-in-depth functions, are identified in the hazard<br />

evaluation and accident analysis sections <strong>of</strong> NSTR-0 1 1-98, Safeiy Anabsis for the Building 991<br />

Complex Final Safety Anaiysis Report (Ref. 1). This chapter correlates those identified safety<br />

features to the Building 991 Complex SSCs capable <strong>of</strong> providing the necessary safety functions.<br />

This chapter then categorizes each <strong>of</strong> the safety SSCs according to their importance to safety<br />

and their operability requirements to perfom their identified safety function.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> System Evaluation Reports (SERs) was not accomplished for the<br />

Building 991 Complex SSCs. Therefore, this chapter provides the safety functions <strong>of</strong> the SSCs,<br />

their boundaries, the support systems required to be operable so the safety SSCs maintain their<br />

safety functions, and the functional requirements <strong>of</strong> the SSCs (the acceptance criteria for each<br />

SSC, including surveillance requirements and frequencies, is detailed in Appendix A,<br />

Building 991 Complex Technical Safety Requirements). This information is presented in a<br />

tabular’ format. In most cases the system descriptions provided in Chapter 2 will suffice,<br />

therefore, this chapter will not provide additional SSC description information unless required<br />

to supplement the Chapter 2 information. The SSCs determined most significant for the safe<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> the facility are covered by Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs).<br />

Safety SSCs for the Building 991 Complex are categorized in two ways to accommodate<br />

Site methodology and <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Enerm Standard 3009-94 (DOE-STD-3009) (Ref. 2)<br />

methodology. These two methodologies do not correlate with each other. The Site<br />

methodology provides System Category (SC) levels for the SSCs so procurement requirements<br />

can be specified. The Site methodolom classifies SSCs as SC-1:’2. SC-3. or SC-4 depending on<br />

their importance in protectinz the MOL CW, and W. The DOE-STD-3009 methodology<br />

classifies SSCs as either safety-class or safety-significant depending on their importance <strong>of</strong><br />

protecting the MOI and the environment. or if they are mdor contributors to defense-in-depth<br />

Section 5.2 discusses categorization <strong>of</strong> the SSCs Der the Site methodoionv and Section 5 3<br />

discusses categorization <strong>of</strong> the SSCs per the DOE-STD-3009 methodolow.<br />

Safety SSCs were identified during three phases <strong>of</strong> the hazard evaluation and accident<br />

analysis process. The first phase wits during the hazard evaluation process. This process<br />

qualitatively evaluated the hazards associated with the activities being conducted at the<br />

Building 99 1 Complex. Assumptions, protective features, and requirements were identified<br />

during this phase. These assumptions, protective features, and requirements could involve SSCs<br />

specifically credited to eliminate a potential accident scenario from further evaluation.<br />

Revision I<br />

Saprernher 1999<br />

5- 1 Building 991 Complex FSAR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!