closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

hazards analysis approach to be used in planning a maintenance activity, including: hazard
identification; walkdowns of area and system; and incorporation of worker safety hazards
analysis using appropriately skilled safety professionals.
The development and implementation of operational controls are typically derived from
the hazard analysis and transferred into work control documents. The IWCP process governs
this function for maintenance and construction activities through the development of specific
controls, such as radiological controls defined in a Radiation Work Permit. The IWCP process
also specifies post-maintenance testing requirements, based on the technical input from
engineering. Lastly, the process requires a formal Safety Evaluation Screen and independent
safety review where appropriate. The controls for safe storage and the conduct of routine
activities are defined in the Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) used to support the
performance of work.
The performance of work at the complex is normally controlled through the Work
Control; Training; Configuration Management, Environmental Protection and Waste
Management, Transportation, and Maintenance programs. Specific activities are scheduled on
the Plan of the Day (POD), are preceded by a pre-evolution briefing, and are formally approved
by the Shift Manager prior to performance. Only appropriately trained personnel are used to
perform the activity. Depending on the type of activity, core team members and building
support personnel may receive a pre-evolution briefing to include a predefined or practiced set
of responses to upset conditions.
Finally, feedback and improvement from performance of work or an operation are
elements of the Quality Assurance (including management assessment), and the Organization
and Management program. IWCP work packages are formally closed out and reviewed by the
Building Manager. Engineering documentation also receives formal close-out. In addition, the
Shift Manager reviews all surveillances and logs to provide close oversight and feedback on a
day-to-day basis. Occurrence Reports provide feedback (e.g., critiques) on conditions and
lessons learned related to routine performance in the complex.
3.3 ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
The Site Integrating Management Contractor (IMC) (i.e., Kaiser-Hill) has overall
responsibility for the operation of the Site in accordance with the Site integrating management
contract with the Department of Energy (DOE). The current contract provides for the Site IMC
to delegate the authority and responsibility to Principal Subcontractors. Rocky Mountain
Remediation Services (RMRS), Limited Liability Corporation (L.L.C.), has overall authority
and responsibility for operation of the Building 991 Complex. Operations conducted in the
Building 991 Complex by other subcontractors are performed in accordance with the
documented authorization basis as maintained by RMRS. RMRS management has assigned
authority and responsibility for the operation of the Building 991 Complex to the Building 991
Facility Manager. Others in the chain of operational responsibility include the Waste
Management Operations Manager, Solid Waste Operations Manager, and Building Manager as
shown in Figure 3-1.
Revision L
September 1999
3 -4
Building 991 Complex FSAR
I
-