17.06.2013 Views

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.4 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS<br />

6.4.1 Introduction<br />

This section identifies the administrative controls that ensure administrative safety<br />

functions necessary for safe facility operation. It builds upon the identification in the hazard and<br />

accident analyses <strong>of</strong> the preventive and mitigative administrative safety features necessary to<br />

protect the public, CW, IW, and the environment, or that provide significant elements <strong>of</strong><br />

defense-in-depth. This section also identifies the administrative controls that ensure the<br />

administrative safety features identified in the hazard and accident analyses, including those<br />

applicable to all postulated accident scenarios (ie., assumed initial conditions). The<br />

administrative controls identified are contained in Appendix A, Building 991 CompZex Technical<br />

Safety Requirements <strong>of</strong> the FSAR.<br />

6.4.2 Identification <strong>of</strong> Administrative Controls<br />

The safety analysis assumptions, features, and requirements section <strong>of</strong> the hazard and<br />

accident analyses in NSTR-011-98 identifies the administrative safety features considered<br />

significant for the Building 991 Complex. These assumptions, features, and requirements<br />

provide the broad set <strong>of</strong> administrative controls considered for accident prevention andor<br />

mitigation, and from which the safety features specifically credited for reducing the risk <strong>of</strong> an<br />

accident to acceptable levels are derived. The administrative controls providing these safety<br />

features are captured by Table 6-2.<br />

Table 6-2 correlates administrative safety features identified in the hazard and accident analyses<br />

to the administrative controls ensuring the conduct <strong>of</strong> those safety functions. The first column <strong>of</strong><br />

the table presents the credited administrative control as derived from the safety analysis<br />

assumptions, features, and requirements. The Scenario Code column provides a cross-reference<br />

to the scenario in which each administrative control is applied (the control could have been<br />

identified in the hazard evaluation, the bounding accident scenario discussion, and/or the<br />

accident analysis). italicized entries in the Scenario Code colunm indicate that the scenario<br />

summaw table does not list the control but that the control is utilized in the detemiination <strong>of</strong><br />

bounding scenarios le.g.. a LLU7 container limit control is not listed for scenarios evaluatiq<br />

TRU waste containers but the LLW limit maintains the TRU waste bounding assumptions). The<br />

third column provides a cross-reference to the TSR administrative control (provided in<br />

Appendix A) that references the control. This column identifies the specific Administrative<br />

Operating Limit (AOL) in the TSR ACs. The final column identifies the safety feature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

credited administrative control and the presents the TSR AC wording for the control.<br />

Revision L<br />

Scotemher 1999<br />

6-9 Building 991 Complex FSAR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!