17.06.2013 Views

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

closure project manager - Document Request - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

uilding. Differential displacement between the two buildings along the corridor axis would be<br />

minimized by soil friction and again no damage to the corridor or buildings is envisioned.<br />

Corridor A, being underground, is not subject to tornado or winds loading, or impact from<br />

tornado-driven missiles. (Ref. 15).<br />

A structural evaluation (Ref. 21) <strong>of</strong> Building 998 was performed to assess the structural<br />

integrity <strong>of</strong> Room 300 and Corridor A due to the depth <strong>of</strong> overburden soil load. The evaluation<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a review <strong>of</strong> the structural drawings and inspection <strong>of</strong> the Room 300 and corridor<br />

structures. The inspection <strong>of</strong> Room300 revealed that the concrete walls are in very good<br />

condition. No signs <strong>of</strong> any structural stress was noted during the inspection. The inspection <strong>of</strong><br />

CorridorA indicated that the concrete walls are in very good condition. There were no<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> any structural overstress cracks. The only problem noted with Corridor A was the<br />

hair line transverse cracks in the ceiling and walls at about the center <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corridor. These cracks are near the transverse construction joint that has a rubber membrane to<br />

keep water from leaking through. Both the cracks and construction joint have leaked in the past.<br />

The evaluation concluded that since the condition <strong>of</strong> Room 300 and Corridor A is good with the<br />

present loads, and since no additional loads are planned, it is justifiable to certify the these areas<br />

as structurally safe. (Ref. 21).<br />

2.2.9 Building 985<br />

Building 985 is a 2,400 square foot filter plenum facility, constructed in 1972. It is a<br />

one-story structure adjacent to the northwest corner <strong>of</strong> Building 991. At the east end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building is a pit in which there is a tank for collecting water that would result from activation <strong>of</strong><br />

the plenum fire protection sprays. There are no Raschig rings in the tank.<br />

Building 985 is approximately 60 feet long by 40 feet wide by 15 feet high. The<br />

foundation <strong>of</strong> the building consists <strong>of</strong> 16 concrete caissons with two foot, 2% foot, and 3 foot<br />

diameters and lengths varying from 13 feet to 34 feet. The caissons support reinforced concrete<br />

grade beams 12 inches thick and five feet deep for interior walls and five feet three inches deep<br />

for exterior walls. The floor slab is reinforced concrete eight inches thick on ground, nominally<br />

1 1 inches thick for pads, and an average 12 inches thick for the sloping pit slab.<br />

The pit walls are 12-inch thick reinforced concrete with an average height <strong>of</strong> 13 feet.<br />

The exterior walls <strong>of</strong> the building are pre-cast concrete, six inches thick. Pre-cast concrete walls<br />

are over 13 feet high. Cast-in-place straight wall and corner wall connections and continuous<br />

perimeter concrete ro<strong>of</strong> beams bond the walls together.<br />

The main ro<strong>of</strong> is precut concrete, twin tee construction with a two inch thick wire mesh<br />

reinforced concrete topping, 1% inch thick insulation, and built-up ro<strong>of</strong>ing. The airlock ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />

are cast-in-place concrete.<br />

Structural framing is poor due to excessive ground erosion at the west end and south side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the building. The entryway and walkway is sinking and pulling away from the building<br />

(Ref. 5). This condition has no effect on the function <strong>of</strong> the filter plenum system. The drainage<br />

Revision I 2-16 Building 99 1 Complex FSAR<br />

September 1999<br />

I<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!