30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

➤ Health and <strong>Safety</strong> (Display Screen Equipment)<br />

Regulations 1992*<br />

➤ Control of Lead at Work Regulations 1998<br />

➤ Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999<br />

➤ Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres<br />

Regulations 2002<br />

➤ Control of Substances Hazardous <strong>to</strong> Health<br />

Regulations 2002<br />

➤ Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005<br />

➤ The Regula<strong>to</strong>ry Reform (<strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>) Order 2005.<br />

*As amended by the Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations<br />

2002.<br />

5.4 Competency <strong>to</strong> conduct risk<br />

assessments<br />

Employers and responsible persons need <strong>to</strong> determine<br />

who should be part of the risk assessment team. A team<br />

approach is often the most effective way <strong>to</strong> ensure that<br />

all the appropriate risks have been identifi ed, this is<br />

because:<br />

Perception – individuals’ perception of risk will be<br />

different. Depending upon age, experience, attitude,<br />

knowledge of the area, etc., one person may have a<br />

completely different view of what constitutes a <strong>to</strong>lerable<br />

(acceptable) or in<strong>to</strong>lerable (unacceptable) risk than<br />

another person. Some people are happy <strong>to</strong> accept risks<br />

which another person would not <strong>to</strong>lerate, and so a different<br />

assessment of risk in the same area would be made<br />

Figure 5.4 Training <strong>to</strong> support risk assessment<br />

86<br />

by different people. To reduce this element of subjectivity<br />

inherent in any risk assessment, it is recommended that<br />

the team approach is adopted and the majority decision<br />

is accepted in areas where disagreements occur.<br />

Limits of knowledge – one person does not have<br />

the overall knowledge required of each process, person,<br />

activity, machine, area, etc., <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> adequately<br />

identify suffi cient hazards. More than one pair of eyes is<br />

necessary <strong>to</strong> ensure that nothing is missed.<br />

Familiarity – a person carrying out a risk assessment<br />

in their own area is likely <strong>to</strong> miss a number of the<br />

present hazards due <strong>to</strong> familiarity or complacency. They<br />

may also be likely <strong>to</strong> accept certain risks as <strong>to</strong>lerable<br />

either because that it is the way they have always been<br />

or because they know they will be the person responsible<br />

for implementing any necessary controls.<br />

Teams – a team approach may be used <strong>to</strong> involve<br />

the people who actually carry out the task or work in the<br />

area and thereby gain their input in<strong>to</strong> any likely hazards<br />

that could be identifi ed <strong>to</strong>gether with any current risk<br />

control measures. If the workforce is able <strong>to</strong> suggest<br />

control measures which are later implemented, this not<br />

only makes the controls more likely <strong>to</strong> be complied with<br />

but also has positive effects on the whole organisation’s<br />

safety culture.<br />

An effective risk assessment team could therefore<br />

involve any or all of the following:<br />

➤ Health and safety/fi re safety advisers<br />

➤ Department managers<br />

➤ Supervisors<br />

➤ Workforce<br />

➤ Competent risk assessors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!