30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 14.4 Aerosol container<br />

noted that fi re fi ghters not expecting the volume of s<strong>to</strong>rage<br />

of aerosols may be placed at risk should a fi re occur.<br />

The immediate actions that could be taken were <strong>to</strong><br />

remove a large proportion of the aerosol containers from<br />

within the building <strong>to</strong> a secure metal s<strong>to</strong>re outside the<br />

building (Priority 1). If no such facility exists it would be<br />

recommended that an approved metal s<strong>to</strong>rage cabinet<br />

be provided (Priority 2). As an interim measure it may be<br />

possible <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>re the aerosols within metal cabinets in<br />

another s<strong>to</strong>rage area where there is limited ignition and<br />

other fuel sources or alternatively remove the ignition<br />

and fuel sources from the current s<strong>to</strong>rage area (Priority<br />

Worked example 2 – Sources of fuel that<br />

may assist fi re growth<br />

An employer (responsible person) is operating<br />

a small service department for mechanical<br />

and electrical equipment. They use a<br />

variety of different chemicals, a number of<br />

which are of an aerosol container type.<br />

They purchase the materials through their<br />

authorised dealership and keep the aerosols<br />

boxed up in their original containers within a<br />

s<strong>to</strong>reroom which is being used <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>re a range<br />

of materials including posters, brochures, etc.<br />

Other than the receipts there is no documentation<br />

relating <strong>to</strong> the management of<br />

these highly fl ammable aerosol units. It was<br />

noted during the visual element of the fi re<br />

risk assessment that some eight <strong>to</strong> ten boxes<br />

each containing a dozen 300 ml aerosols were<br />

being s<strong>to</strong>red.<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> risk assessment<br />

2). The recommendations considered are likely <strong>to</strong> need<br />

discussing with the manager responsible <strong>to</strong> achieve the<br />

initial risk reduction measures.<br />

The health and safety/fi re safety arrangements<br />

section in the policy will need <strong>to</strong> refl ect the s<strong>to</strong>rage, use,<br />

handling, disposal, etc. of the aerosols and the provision<br />

of adequate levels of supervision and training will also<br />

need <strong>to</strong> be addressed.<br />

Ideally, each of these areas will address the need<br />

<strong>to</strong> reduce the quantity of aerosols being s<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> an<br />

absolute minimum (perhaps making arrangements for<br />

‘daily call-off’ from the supplier). While it is appreciated<br />

that some of the controls will require immediate action<br />

the policy and procedures will take a number of months<br />

<strong>to</strong> complete; raising awareness of staff and reducing the<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ck levels must be seen as a priority in the short term<br />

and the recommended risk controls refl ect this.<br />

Given that the only existing control measures<br />

(wooden doors, some of which were secured and<br />

signed, <strong>to</strong>gether with a policy on who could gain access)<br />

were inadequate the hazard of a fi re starting within the<br />

service riser would likely present a signifi cant risk of<br />

smoke spread throughout the building placing anyone in<br />

the building at risk.<br />

The recommendations arising from the fi ndings<br />

would therefore relate <strong>to</strong> the provision of intumescent<br />

strips and where appropriate cold smoke seals, <strong>to</strong> bring<br />

the service riser doors/door sets up <strong>to</strong> British Standard<br />

476 (Priority 3).<br />

Consideration may also be given <strong>to</strong> the provision<br />

of fi re s<strong>to</strong>pping (intumescent cushions, pillows, etc.)<br />

between each fl oor within the service risers (Priority 3).<br />

The initial steps (Priority 1) would also be <strong>to</strong> secure<br />

all the doors <strong>to</strong> the service risers and remind the<br />

management team <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r this issue.<br />

A further recommendation may be <strong>to</strong> review the<br />

policy and arrangements for the management of fi re <strong>to</strong><br />

include a monthly inspection/safety <strong>to</strong>ur programme<br />

(Priority 3/4).<br />

On occasions a number of controls may need <strong>to</strong> be<br />

cross-referenced such as the provision of au<strong>to</strong>matic fi re<br />

detection linked <strong>to</strong> the existing fi re alarm system, which<br />

may also be recommended within the service riser units.<br />

The existing control measures identifi ed in the above<br />

example have already reduced the risk signifi cantly (low<br />

level); people are provided with a warning in the event<br />

of fi re and they should be able <strong>to</strong> hear or know when <strong>to</strong><br />

respond in the event of an emergency.<br />

It is likely that the risk assessor (risk assessment<br />

team) will have been provided with a large number of<br />

supporting documents, the majority of which are detailed<br />

earlier within this chapter. It would appear from the<br />

example that the only issue <strong>to</strong> deal with is the obstruction<br />

of an alarm sounder which can be addressed immediately<br />

by the removal of the obstruction. To support this<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!