30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

High 100%<br />

Level of supervision<br />

Low<br />

0%<br />

Low<br />

High<br />

Formal supervision<br />

found in BS 5839 Part 1, whereas the mechanisms for<br />

ensuring that persons can safely evacuate in the event of<br />

an emergency (means of escape) will depend upon active<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>ring such as inspections and safety <strong>to</strong>urs.<br />

The moni<strong>to</strong>ring and management of contrac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

is also required at a high level particularly when works<br />

involve high risk processes such as the use of fl ammable<br />

substances or where works are undertaken on access<br />

and egress routes.<br />

Consideration must also be given <strong>to</strong> how an organ -<br />

isation moni<strong>to</strong>rs emergency exercises and its training<br />

and competency levels, as the protective measures<br />

implemented by it <strong>to</strong> keep people safe will rely upon them<br />

following procedures for which they have been trained.<br />

6.5 Safe systems of work<br />

Competence<br />

risk<br />

Figure 6.8 Diagram of levels of supervision from HS(G)65<br />

6.5.1 What is a safe system of work (SSOW)?<br />

A critical element in controlling primary fi re and other<br />

workplace hazards is the use of a safe system of work<br />

(SSOW). This SSOW, in simple terms, defi nes a way<br />

of undertaking a task in a safe manner, for instance it<br />

would defi ne the safe way of refuelling a forklift truck<br />

Defi nition of a safe system of work:<br />

Self supervision<br />

A step-by-step procedure based upon the<br />

integration of people, equipment, mater ials,<br />

and the environment, <strong>to</strong> produce an acceptable<br />

level of safety.<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

General principles of control<br />

powered by LPG, or the safe way of undertaking hot<br />

work processes.<br />

Safe systems of work appear in a variety of forms<br />

including:<br />

➤ Standard operating procedures<br />

➤ Safe operating procedures<br />

➤ Method statements.<br />

Such a system of work would on the majority of occasions<br />

be formally recorded and documented, taking in<strong>to</strong><br />

account all foreseeable risks associated with the operation<br />

and detail the procedure for minimisation of the risk,<br />

or where reasonably practicable the complete elimination<br />

of the risk.<br />

As can be seen from the above defi nition the safe<br />

system of work should provide a step-by-step approach<br />

which integrates all the facets that will secure the safety<br />

of not only those undertaking the task or job, but also<br />

those who may be affected by it.<br />

As previously discussed, it is the risk assessment<br />

that determines the need for a safe system of work <strong>to</strong><br />

be introduced, as part of the mechanisms by which the<br />

hazard and associated risks are controlled. The safe<br />

system of work relies heavily upon human behaviour<br />

and discipline and therefore selecting a safe system of<br />

work above other control strategies, such as elimination,<br />

should not be considered.<br />

The procedural controls developed in the creation of<br />

the safe system of work will also have <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account<br />

technical control measures including design features<br />

such as the use of guards on cutting equipment, noise<br />

reduction systems and workplace modifi cations. Each<br />

of these will be supported by behavioural controls which<br />

address the individual in terms of selection and training,<br />

which are included in the ‘safe person approach’.<br />

The actual control measures should be selected on<br />

the basis of their effectiveness, applicability, practicability<br />

and, fi nally, cost. Some controls may be dictated by legal<br />

requirements, e.g. equipment guards. In most cases,<br />

however, it is usual <strong>to</strong> apply a hierarchy of measures such<br />

as that given in the publication Successful Health and<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (HS(G)65).<br />

It is often the case that complex or unusual tasks<br />

are required <strong>to</strong> have a formally documented SSOW. Over<br />

recent years the formal system has been adopted for the<br />

majority of routine tasks as their production assists in<br />

defi ning the safety standards required of an operation or<br />

process and importantly provides a basis for the provision<br />

of information, instruction and training programmes.<br />

A number of pieces of current legislation refer <strong>to</strong><br />

the requirement for the production of safe systems of<br />

work, <strong>to</strong>gether with the provision of information, instruction<br />

and training. Therefore in addition <strong>to</strong> introducing<br />

measurable standards, the introduction of safe systems<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!