30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

In order <strong>to</strong> prevent the formation of an explosive<br />

atmosphere from the dispersion of dust in air or by<br />

equipment, it is appropriate <strong>to</strong> design conveying and<br />

removal systems <strong>to</strong> an approved standard. Such<br />

equipment will remove the levels of dust within the<br />

enclosure which will help <strong>to</strong> avoid primary explosions;<br />

however, secondary explosions could still easily occur if<br />

the lying dust is suffi ciently agitated leading <strong>to</strong> entrainment<br />

in the conveying and removal systems.<br />

The avoidance of ignition sources that may precipitate<br />

an explosion for either gas or dust in the atmosphere<br />

provides a relatively good control measure; however, in<br />

relation <strong>to</strong> dusts, accumulations and moisture content<br />

must be managed effectively as <strong>to</strong>gether they have the<br />

potential for self-heating and therefore self-ignition, thus<br />

the management of temperature and moisture in relation<br />

<strong>to</strong> dust must be considered.<br />

Mechanical inputs can also produce either glowing<br />

sparks or hot spots and while the sparks are not<br />

suffi ciently energetic <strong>to</strong> provide ignition repeated contact<br />

may run the risk of igniting a dust cloud.<br />

The removal of any foreign objects from process<br />

streams and the use of non-sparking or spark-proof<br />

equipment (intrinsically safe) must be considered in<br />

either gaseous or dusty atmospheres.<br />

Ensuring that any electrical equipment is subject <strong>to</strong><br />

regular maintenance (planned preventive maintenance)<br />

must also be seen as a key area <strong>to</strong> prevent ignition<br />

sources initiating an explosion.<br />

Electrostatic sparks from static electricity must also<br />

be minimised and the following should be considered:<br />

➤ The use of conducting materials for equipment,<br />

plant, etc. <strong>to</strong> avoid charge build-up<br />

➤ The earthing of any equipment that may become<br />

charged<br />

➤ The earthing of workers<br />

➤ Earth non-conducting materials via an earth rod<br />

through the s<strong>to</strong>rage vessel.<br />

With regard <strong>to</strong> electrostatic discharges if there is any<br />

doubt earthing should take place.<br />

Mitigation<br />

In relation <strong>to</strong> dust the best way <strong>to</strong> contain a primary<br />

explosion is <strong>to</strong> ensure that the process equipment is<br />

strong enough <strong>to</strong> withstand it. Dust explosion pressures<br />

are usually within range of 5–12 bars. Designing<br />

the plant as though it were a pressure vessel is likely<br />

<strong>to</strong> cause it <strong>to</strong> be very expensive and beyond what is<br />

reasonably practicable. It is therefore quite often that<br />

designers will resort <strong>to</strong> explosion venting.<br />

Explosion venting is one of the most effective ways<br />

<strong>to</strong> relieve pressure; however, it is often diffi cult <strong>to</strong> size<br />

132<br />

Dust<br />

explosion<br />

Figure 7.31 A vented dust explosion<br />

the vent correctly <strong>to</strong> ensure that suffi cient pressure relief<br />

is available as it must allow suffi cient outfl ow of the<br />

burnt fuel and air <strong>to</strong> relieve the pressure being generated<br />

by the heat of the explosion.<br />

There are a wide variety of differing designs of<br />

venting dependent upon processes undertaken. These<br />

can be simple panels that are ejected, vent covers<br />

(attached <strong>to</strong> process vessels with clips and rubber<br />

seals), and hinged doors that can withstand explosions<br />

or where necessary redirect the explosion.<br />

The vent area will depend upon the volume of the<br />

enclosure, the enclosure’s strength, the strength of the<br />

vent cover and burning rate of the dust cloud.<br />

There are a number of hazards caused by venting<br />

which will need <strong>to</strong> be taken in<strong>to</strong> consideration, these are:<br />

➤ Emission of blast waves from the vent opening<br />

➤ Ejection of fl ames from vent opening<br />

➤ <strong>Fire</strong>balls can be ejected<br />

➤ Emission of solid objects (parts of the vessel, vent<br />

covers, etc.)<br />

➤ Reaction forces on the equipment, induced by the<br />

venting process<br />

➤ Internal venting may also lead <strong>to</strong> secondary<br />

explosions.<br />

Consideration must be given <strong>to</strong> the location of any<br />

explosion relief panel or venting, this must be con sidered<br />

at the design stage.<br />

If venting an explosion cannot be achieved,<br />

explosion suppression may be considered. Any<br />

suppression unit must be permanently pressurised, fi tted<br />

with a large diameter discharge orifi ce and any valve<br />

required <strong>to</strong> operate the discharge mechanism should be<br />

of high speed which is quite often achieved via a small<br />

de<strong>to</strong>nation charge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!