30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

Introduction to Fire Safety Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 11.5 Records should be kept in a local fi re safety<br />

log book<br />

Figure 11.6 Misuse of electrical adap<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

the issue <strong>to</strong>gether with recommendations <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />

compliance.<br />

In order <strong>to</strong> ensure that resources are targeted at the<br />

non-compliance issues that present the most signifi -<br />

cant risk a prioritisation or ranking system may also be<br />

applied.<br />

Moni<strong>to</strong>ring, auditing and reviewing fi re safety systems<br />

This will require high risk areas <strong>to</strong> be weighted in<br />

such a way that prioritised action is given, for example<br />

the misuse of electrical adap<strong>to</strong>rs which present a danger<br />

of fi re, rather than the provision of signage above fi re<br />

extinguishers <strong>to</strong> denote their type (which is indicated<br />

on the extinguisher body). Ideally, the inspection record<br />

form will also identify who will be responsible for<br />

implementing any recommended actions, <strong>to</strong>gether with<br />

a target date for implementation.<br />

A systematic approach <strong>to</strong> an inspection programme<br />

is likely <strong>to</strong> include:<br />

➤ The preparation of a well-designed<br />

inspection form that will help <strong>to</strong> plan<br />

and initiate remedial action – it may also<br />

assist in ranking any substandard conditions/defi<br />

ciencies in order of importance<br />

➤ Summary lists of any remedial action<br />

required with names and arbitrary timescales<br />

<strong>to</strong> track implementation progress<br />

➤ A periodic analysis of completed inspection<br />

forms <strong>to</strong> enable identifi cation of<br />

common trends which may reveal system<br />

weaknesses<br />

➤ The gathering of information <strong>to</strong> consider<br />

changes required <strong>to</strong> the frequency, type<br />

or nature of the inspection programme.<br />

11.3.2 Who will conduct the inspection?<br />

The responsibility for either conducting the inspection<br />

itself or nominating persons <strong>to</strong> undertake the inspection<br />

is likely <strong>to</strong> be part of the fi re safety manager’s role<br />

(a variety of titles may be given <strong>to</strong> the person who has<br />

overall control of fi re safety management) in accordance<br />

with British Standard 5588 Part 12 and current best<br />

practice.<br />

Who is responsible and for what should be clearly<br />

identifi ed within the fi re safety arrangements section<br />

within the policy.<br />

For any inspection <strong>to</strong> be of value, a trained,<br />

competent person or team must conduct it. In larger<br />

organisations the role of the fi re warden/marshal (whose<br />

main function is <strong>to</strong> assist persons <strong>to</strong> escape safely<br />

in the event of a fi re) is extended <strong>to</strong> undertake part of<br />

the inspection process, which may be referred <strong>to</strong> as a<br />

safety <strong>to</strong>ur, as the process involves a physical check of<br />

the areas for which they are fulfi lling their fi re warden/<br />

marshal function.<br />

These safety <strong>to</strong>urs are slightly less formal than a full<br />

inspection programme; however, they assist in fulfi lling<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!