18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Several factors <strong>in</strong>fluence the percentage <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue that each prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

derives from <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. The primary factor is the amount <strong>of</strong> money their citizens spend on<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Table 30 displays the strong relationship between percentage <strong>of</strong> total revenue<br />

derived from <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, and prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue per adult (r = .85, p = .002, N = 10).<br />

It is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this report to elucidate all the factors responsible for per capita<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure. However, one <strong>of</strong> the more obvious and important ones is the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, especially the forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> that garner the largest revenue (i.e., EGMs). As<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> Table 29, follow<strong>in</strong>g the rapid <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> cas<strong>in</strong>os <strong>in</strong> most prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> the late 1990s<br />

(later for British Columbia) the prov<strong>in</strong>ces and territories with cas<strong>in</strong>os (<strong>in</strong> the top half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

table: Alberta, Saskatchewan, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, Quebec) have<br />

tended to derive their budgets from <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> to a greater extent than prov<strong>in</strong>ces and territories<br />

without cas<strong>in</strong>os (listed <strong>in</strong> the lower half <strong>of</strong> the table: New Brunswick, Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Edward Island,<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador, Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut). It is<br />

important to recognize that most <strong>of</strong> these latter jurisdictions nonetheless still have EGMs <strong>in</strong><br />

bars and lounges. The lowest percentage <strong>of</strong> government revenue derived from <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

occurs <strong>in</strong> the jurisdictions without any EGMs at all: Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories, and<br />

Nunavut.<br />

A second important factor related to per capita <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure concerns available<br />

<strong>in</strong>come to spend on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (see Table 30). The correlation <strong>in</strong> Table 30 between average per<br />

adult <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue and median after-tax <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> each prov<strong>in</strong>ce is quite strong: r = .65, p<br />

= .04 (2 tail), N = 10.<br />

Table 30: Comparison <strong>of</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Government Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Revenue.<br />

Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Revenue as<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total Prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

Revenue <strong>in</strong> 2007<br />

Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Revenue<br />

per Adult 18+ <strong>in</strong> 2008<br />

135<br />

Median After-Tax<br />

Income <strong>in</strong> 2007 for<br />

Economic Families (2+)<br />

Alberta 6.2% $790 $75,300<br />

British Columbia 5.6% $540 $63,300<br />

Saskatchewan 5.8% $830 $59,900<br />

Manitoba 5.3% $690 $58,300<br />

Ontario 4.8% $465 $65,900<br />

Nova Scotia 3.9% $420 $54,200<br />

Quebec 3.6% $440 $54,500<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Edward Island 3.2% $385 $52,600<br />

New Brunswick 3.1% $365 $50,600<br />

Newfoundland & Labrador 2.9% $480 $50,900<br />

CANADA 4.7% $520 $61,800<br />

Sources: Statistics Canada, Perspectives on Labour and Income; Gambl<strong>in</strong>g, August 2010 and Statistics Canada<br />

CANSIM table 111-0001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!