gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B<strong>in</strong>go<br />
Charitable and religious groups have provided b<strong>in</strong>go <strong>in</strong> Alberta s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1920s, us<strong>in</strong>g their<br />
exemption under the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code to conduct small raffles. The ma<strong>in</strong> changes concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
b<strong>in</strong>go <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> legal regulation and provision have been as follows:<br />
1920s Courts rule that b<strong>in</strong>go constitutes a violation <strong>of</strong> the prohibition aga<strong>in</strong>st ‘common gam<strong>in</strong>g houses’,<br />
as the operator receives a f<strong>in</strong>ancial ga<strong>in</strong> from its provision.<br />
1938 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code amended to clarify that a place is not a ‘common gam<strong>in</strong>g house’ if it is<br />
‘occasionally’ used by charitable or religious groups and the proceeds from the games go to<br />
charitable or religious causes.<br />
1969 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code amendment to permit the operation <strong>of</strong> lottery schemes by the federal government<br />
or prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments either alone or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments.<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments, <strong>in</strong> turn, could issue a gam<strong>in</strong>g licence to charitable or religious<br />
organizations, agricultural fairs or exhibitions, or any <strong>in</strong>dividual. However charitable/religious<br />
organizations are permitted to operate lottery schemes only if proceeds used for charitable or<br />
religious purposes, tickets cost no more than 50 cents, and the prize does not exceed $100.<br />
1979 Dedicated b<strong>in</strong>go halls beg<strong>in</strong> operation (3 <strong>in</strong> Edmonton).<br />
1982 With the creation <strong>of</strong> dedicated b<strong>in</strong>go halls it becomes a requirement that groups <strong>of</strong> charities have<br />
to form ‘b<strong>in</strong>go associations’ so as to coord<strong>in</strong>ate b<strong>in</strong>go events <strong>in</strong> these venues. In subsequent<br />
years the large majority <strong>of</strong> b<strong>in</strong>go revenue derives from ‘Association’ b<strong>in</strong>go.<br />
1985 Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code amendment elim<strong>in</strong>ates the monetary limits on raffle prizes and tickets operated<br />
by authorized charitable or religious organizations.<br />
1993 Alberta government grants permission to the Tsuu T’<strong>in</strong>a First Nation and the Enoch Cree First<br />
Nation to hold super-b<strong>in</strong>gos with jackpots exceed<strong>in</strong>g $10,000.<br />
1996 L<strong>in</strong>ked Satellite B<strong>in</strong>go is <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to some b<strong>in</strong>go halls by a private provider.<br />
2000 AGLC implements the majority <strong>of</strong> recommendations from the B<strong>in</strong>go Review Committee: creation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a prov<strong>in</strong>cial b<strong>in</strong>go manager, explicit criteria for grant<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>in</strong>go licences, clearer def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong><br />
‘charitable organization’ and ‘charitable purpose’, 16 and 17 year olds able to participate <strong>in</strong> nonassociation<br />
b<strong>in</strong>go events.<br />
2003 Digital (DIGI) B<strong>in</strong>go (hand-held electronic device that replaces paper cards) and electronic Keno<br />
are <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to b<strong>in</strong>go halls.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices that speak to changes concern<strong>in</strong>g the actual availability <strong>of</strong> b<strong>in</strong>go are the: a)<br />
total number <strong>of</strong> b<strong>in</strong>go licences issued each year, as reported <strong>in</strong> Table 3, with these same figures<br />
adjusted for population <strong>in</strong>creases seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 3; b) total number <strong>of</strong> licensed b<strong>in</strong>go halls each<br />
year as reported <strong>in</strong> Table 4, with these same figures adjusted for population <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />
4; c) total number <strong>of</strong> b<strong>in</strong>go events each year as reported <strong>in</strong> Table 5, with these same figures<br />
adjusted for population <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.<br />
As can been seen, per adult b<strong>in</strong>go availability steadily <strong>in</strong>creased until the mid 1990s but has<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>ed s<strong>in</strong>ce that time to levels not seen s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1970s.<br />
54