gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notable <strong>in</strong> both studies is the absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidents associated with loan-shark<strong>in</strong>g, money<br />
launder<strong>in</strong>g, and cheat<strong>in</strong>g-at-play, all <strong>of</strong> which undoubtedly occur to some extent.<br />
Alberta Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Liquor Commission Data<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> AGLC’s mandate is to license, regulate, and monitor <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and liquor activities <strong>in</strong><br />
Alberta <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Liquor Act, Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Liquor Regulation, and the<br />
Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code <strong>of</strong> Canada. To help meet this part <strong>of</strong> their mandate the Regulatory Division <strong>of</strong><br />
AGLC has an <strong>in</strong>vestigations arm which is primarily responsible for a) enforc<strong>in</strong>g terms and<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> AGLC licens<strong>in</strong>g agreements, b) perform<strong>in</strong>g background checks on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
owners, employees, volunteers, and suppliers, c) <strong>in</strong>vestigate crim<strong>in</strong>al occurrences related to<br />
licensed <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, d) coord<strong>in</strong>ate with municipal law enforcement agencies to gather, analyze,<br />
and dissem<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong>telligence.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestigations branch <strong>of</strong> the Regulatory Division <strong>of</strong> AGLC is a multi-agency task force<br />
called the Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Investigations Team (GIT) (formed <strong>in</strong> 2001). This task force is funded by<br />
AGLC and is responsible for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g crimes that occur on licensed gam<strong>in</strong>g premises (e.g.,<br />
cheat<strong>in</strong>g at play, theft) as well as illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (unlicensed gam<strong>in</strong>g houses, bookmak<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
etc.). GIT <strong>in</strong>vestigators are RCMP and municipal police <strong>of</strong>ficers whose wages are paid by AGLC.<br />
There are 2 full time RCMP <strong>of</strong>ficers, one <strong>in</strong> Calgary and one <strong>in</strong> Edmonton. There are 4 half-time<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers, with one <strong>in</strong> Camrose, one <strong>in</strong> <strong>Lethbridge</strong>, one <strong>in</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e Hat, and one <strong>in</strong> the Tsuu T’<strong>in</strong>a<br />
First Nation.<br />
Gambl<strong>in</strong>g venues are required to report to GIT any illegal activity on their premises for<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigation. A request for data was made to the Executive Director <strong>of</strong> the Regulatory Division<br />
<strong>of</strong> AGLC (Gill Hermanns). Mr. Hermanns <strong>in</strong>dicated that this data was kept by the police and not<br />
the AGLC. However, <strong>in</strong> a telephone <strong>in</strong>terview he <strong>in</strong>dicated he was confident that illegal<br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> activity has decreased with the <strong>in</strong>fusion <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, and attributed this<br />
decrease to the notion that people feel more secure go<strong>in</strong>g to a legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> venue when<br />
presented with the choice <strong>of</strong> both legal and illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, therefore decreas<strong>in</strong>g the market<br />
for illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Mr. Hermanns also po<strong>in</strong>ted out that while illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has decreased it<br />
has not been abolished, and made reference to a recent <strong>in</strong>vestigation where “gray mach<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were seized from the backroom <strong>of</strong> a restaurant”.<br />
There is some historical data that is useful to exam<strong>in</strong>e. Prior to the formation <strong>of</strong> AGLC, the<br />
Gam<strong>in</strong>g Control Branch <strong>in</strong> the Attorney General’s <strong>of</strong>fice was responsible for the control and<br />
regulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. The Gam<strong>in</strong>g Control Branch reported <strong>in</strong>vestigation statistics <strong>in</strong> their<br />
annual reports from 1991 to 1995, reported <strong>in</strong> Table 52. Essentially these data confirm the<br />
police <strong>in</strong>cident report data <strong>in</strong> that theft and fraud tend to be the most common types <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong>fences, along with various forms <strong>of</strong> cheat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
192