gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Crime<br />
It is a common perception that <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is associated with <strong>in</strong>creased crime.<br />
However, <strong>in</strong> many ways this may be a vestige <strong>of</strong> the well publicized <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> organized<br />
crime <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the United States <strong>in</strong> the 1940s. The actual<br />
empirical evidence <strong>of</strong> an association is mixed, with almost as many studies f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g no impact on<br />
crime as studies that have found <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> crime as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased availability <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (Williams, Rehm & Stevens, 2011).<br />
Theoretically, the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> should <strong>in</strong>fluence crime rates <strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> several<br />
ways. One way is by decreas<strong>in</strong>g the rate <strong>of</strong> illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. A second is by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> problem gamblers, a m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>of</strong> which engage <strong>in</strong> crimes (primarily property crime)<br />
to support their <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. A third is because certa<strong>in</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (e.g., cas<strong>in</strong>os) <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased opportunities for illegal activity to occur (e.g., pass<strong>in</strong>g counterfeit money, money<br />
launder<strong>in</strong>g, cheat<strong>in</strong>g-at-play). A fourth is by creation <strong>of</strong> venues that serve alcohol and thereby<br />
potentially contribute to alcohol-related <strong>of</strong>fences, and/or venues that disproportionately<br />
attract a clientele with crim<strong>in</strong>al tendencies. A fifth and f<strong>in</strong>al way is by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the overall<br />
number <strong>of</strong> visitors to the area (this population is <strong>of</strong>ten not taken <strong>in</strong>to account when<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a jurisdiction’s crime rate per capita).<br />
Population Surveys<br />
Several questions <strong>in</strong> the 2008 and 2009 Alberta population surveys potentially shed light on<br />
the rate at which <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> problems directly lead to crim<strong>in</strong>al activity: a) “Has your<br />
<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> caused you or someone close to you to write bad cheques, take<br />
money that didn't belong to you or commit other illegal acts to support your <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />
past 12 months?”, b) “In the past 12 months has <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> ever caused an <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong><br />
domestic violence <strong>in</strong> your household?”, c) “In the past 12 months, how much money have<br />
you illegally obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to gamble?”, d) “In the past 12 months has your <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
been a factor <strong>in</strong> your committ<strong>in</strong>g a crime for which you have been arrested?”, e) “Were you<br />
convicted for this crime?”, and f) “Were you <strong>in</strong>carcerated for this crime?”. (Note: Earlier <strong>in</strong><br />
this report domestic violence was addressed under family impacts <strong>of</strong> problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
However, because domestic violence is also an assault violation <strong>in</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code <strong>of</strong><br />
Canada it will be dealt with <strong>in</strong> this section as well).<br />
Among the 403 problem gamblers from the comb<strong>in</strong>ed 2008 and 2009 surveys, 29/403 (7.2%<br />
+ 2.5%) <strong>in</strong>dicated that their <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> had caused them to commit an illegal act, 17/403 (4.2%<br />
+ 1.9%) <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was the cause <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>cident <strong>of</strong> domestic violence, 25/403<br />
(6.2% + 2.4%) <strong>in</strong>dicated they had obta<strong>in</strong>ed money illegally for their <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, 5/403 (1.2% +<br />
1.1%) <strong>in</strong>dicated they had been arrested for committ<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>-related crime, 2/403<br />
(0.5%) <strong>in</strong>dicated they were convicted for this crime, and 1/403 (0.2%) <strong>in</strong>dicated they were<br />
<strong>in</strong>carcerated for this crime.<br />
186