gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ABSTRACT<br />
At a prov<strong>in</strong>cial level, there would appear to be m<strong>in</strong>or economic benefits to <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta<br />
that are <strong>of</strong>fset by m<strong>in</strong>or economic costs. The ma<strong>in</strong> economic benefits concern the fact that<br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> appears to create additional economic activity without any obvious negative impacts<br />
on other bus<strong>in</strong>ess, and <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is associated with a very small <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure. At a community level, however, there are significant and unambiguous<br />
economic benefits to First Nations communities that host cas<strong>in</strong>os, because <strong>of</strong> their ability to<br />
reta<strong>in</strong> a large part <strong>of</strong> the revenue. Although this <strong>in</strong>creased revenue is mostly derived from non-<br />
First Nations communities (primarily Edmonton and Calgary), it represents a relatively small<br />
cost to these large urban economies. The economic costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta concern the<br />
fact that the creation <strong>of</strong> domestic <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> opportunities has more likely <strong>in</strong>creased monetary<br />
outflow to out-<strong>of</strong>-prov<strong>in</strong>ce jurisdictions rather than reta<strong>in</strong>ed it. However, the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
outflow is small relative to overall Alberta Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It is also worth<br />
not<strong>in</strong>g that the model used <strong>in</strong> Alberta, whereby the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and community<br />
groups are the primary beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue, is a system that best ensures that<br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue stays <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce and the economic benefits accrue to Albertans.<br />
From a social/nonmonetary perspective, it can be said that there are important social benefits<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta that are <strong>of</strong>fset by some serious negative consequences. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />
social benefit is the enhanced community services that Albertans receive from<br />
charity/community groups and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed and/or enhanced public services from the prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />
government. Other important social benefits are the fact that a) well-regulated legalized<br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has significantly decreased non-regulated illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, and b) <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has<br />
provided an additional leisure option that is fairly well patronized. Legalized <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> also<br />
appears to provide m<strong>in</strong>or employment benefits. Gambl<strong>in</strong>g’s negative social impacts concern<br />
the fact that it is slightly regressive, and it creates a small amount <strong>of</strong> additional crime (that is<br />
<strong>of</strong>fset to some extent by a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> illegal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>). However, the ma<strong>in</strong> negative<br />
impact is problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, which directly or <strong>in</strong>directly affects 8% to 10% <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
and which <strong>in</strong>volves particularly serious consequences for a small m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>of</strong> these people<br />
(bankruptcy, divorce, unemployment, crime, suicide). For some <strong>of</strong> these consequences<br />
(bankruptcy, suicide) <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> appears to be an important contributor to their overall<br />
prevalence with<strong>in</strong> Alberta. However, a) the legal availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is only partly<br />
responsible for the prevalence <strong>of</strong> problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (i.e., problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> existed to some<br />
extent prior to legal provision, and the relationship between legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> availability and<br />
problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence <strong>in</strong> Alberta is weak), and b) problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is only partly<br />
responsible for these serious consequences (i.e., the comorbid conditions <strong>of</strong> problem gamblers<br />
are additional contribut<strong>in</strong>g factors). A more directly attributable and ethically problematic<br />
aspect <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is the fact the large majority <strong>of</strong> government and charity <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
revenue is derived from a very small percentage <strong>of</strong> the population which <strong>in</strong>cludes a<br />
disproportionate percentage <strong>of</strong> problem gamblers.<br />
7