18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significant change <strong>in</strong> reported cas<strong>in</strong>o expenditure between 2008 and 2009 either for New<br />

Cas<strong>in</strong>o Areas (p = .12, 2 tail) or for Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o Areas (p = .31, 2 tail).<br />

With regards to <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> status on the PPGM, a significant change <strong>in</strong> PPGM categorization <strong>in</strong><br />

the New Cas<strong>in</strong>o Areas occurred from 2008 to 2009 (Chi Square (3df) = 34.7, p = < .001).<br />

Similarly, a significant change from 2008 to 2009 was observed <strong>in</strong> the Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o Areas<br />

(Chi Square (3df) = 102.8, p < .001). However, <strong>in</strong> both cases, pairwise comparisons showed this<br />

to be due to a decrease <strong>in</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> Non-Gamblers and a correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> Recreational Gamblers from 2008 and 2009 (i.e., although the rate <strong>of</strong> problem<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased somewhat <strong>in</strong> the New Cas<strong>in</strong>o Area and decreased somewhat <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o Area, these changes were not statistically significant). The reason for this<br />

change <strong>in</strong> general <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence is unclear, as it is not mirrored <strong>in</strong> the General<br />

Population data (the Alberta-wide prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2008 was 72.2% versus 73.5% <strong>in</strong><br />

2009) (Table 18, p. 103). It is possible that <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> participation <strong>in</strong> 2009 <strong>in</strong> these<br />

regions is related to the worldwide recession that occurred <strong>in</strong> 2008/2009 (Statistics Canada<br />

reports that the recession <strong>in</strong> Canada lasted from the fall <strong>of</strong> 2008 to the summer <strong>of</strong> 2009).<br />

Table 42: Gambl<strong>in</strong>g and Problem Gambl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> New versus Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o Areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2008 and 2009.<br />

New Cas<strong>in</strong>o Area<br />

Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o<br />

Area<br />

2008 2009 2008 2009<br />

Past Year Slot Mach<strong>in</strong>e Patronage 19.6% 19.1% 16.4% 16.9%<br />

Past Year Table Game Patronage 7.1% 7.0% 7.0% 5.2%<br />

Average Monthly Cas<strong>in</strong>o Expenditure $59 $94 $48 $67<br />

Median Monthly Cas<strong>in</strong>o Expenditure $20 $20 $20 $20<br />

PPGM Non-Gambler 25.5% 17.3% 30.1% 17.3%<br />

PPGM Recreational Gambler 66.3% 73.5% 61.8% 72.7%<br />

PPGM At Risk Gambler 6.3% 6.6% 5.8% 7.9%<br />

PPGM Problem & Pathological Gambler 1.9% 2.6% 2.3% 2.0%<br />

Change with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual regions may be obscured by these aggregated results. Thus, change <strong>in</strong><br />

cas<strong>in</strong>o expenditure and problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence for each <strong>in</strong>dividual region from 2008 to<br />

2009 is reported <strong>in</strong> Table 43. Only the Fort McMurray area (Established Cas<strong>in</strong>o area) had a<br />

statistically significant change (<strong>in</strong>crease) <strong>in</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure from 2008 to 2009 (Mann-<br />

Whitney U = 4258, p = .04, 2 tail). The relatively small sample sizes for each region (500 per<br />

region <strong>in</strong> 2008 and 400 <strong>in</strong> 2009) limit the ability to show statistically significant differences <strong>in</strong><br />

problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> rates if they did exist. And <strong>in</strong>deed, no statistically significant differences <strong>in</strong><br />

PPGM problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> prevalence was observed <strong>in</strong> any region from 2008 to 2009, with one<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!