18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPACTS ON SOCIETY<br />

The citizens <strong>of</strong> Alberta are the ones who partake <strong>in</strong> legalized <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and are also the primary<br />

recipients <strong>of</strong> the benefits disbursed by the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and charitable organizations.<br />

Thus, they constitute a particularly important sector <strong>in</strong> which impacts are anticipated.<br />

Government and Charitable <strong>Services</strong><br />

As has already been clearly stated, Albertans are the direct recipients and primary beneficiaries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the roughly $2 billion dollars annually that the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and charity/community<br />

organizations have collected <strong>in</strong> net <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue <strong>in</strong> the past few years (Figure 28, p. 125).<br />

In addition, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007 Albertan citizens <strong>of</strong> First Nations communities have also started<br />

to receive similar direct benefits deriv<strong>in</strong>g from the new First Nations cas<strong>in</strong>os. These collective<br />

benefits are primarily manifest <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed and/or perhaps enhanced public<br />

services, and/or a decreased need to raise <strong>in</strong>voluntary taxes (<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> non-First Nations<br />

communities). These represent some <strong>of</strong> the most important and unambiguously positive<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> legalized <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta. (Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed and/or enhanced public services have<br />

tended to be a reliable impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> across all jurisdictions that have studied this issue<br />

(Williams, Rehm, & Stevens, 2011)).<br />

Employment<br />

Most studies <strong>of</strong> the socioeconomic impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> have found <strong>in</strong>creased employment<br />

associated with <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction (Williams, Rehm, & Stevens, 2011). However, this is<br />

primarily due to the limited scope <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> these studies, <strong>in</strong> that they only exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

employment changes <strong>in</strong> the local region where the new <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> venue was located without<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether there were potential losses <strong>in</strong> other regions. When a larger geographic<br />

scope is used, then net jurisdiction-wide employment ga<strong>in</strong>s are not usually found (Williams,<br />

Rehm, & Stevens, 2011). These same <strong>in</strong>vestigators have also found that there are significantly<br />

different <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> impacts as a function <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. There is greater potential for<br />

employment ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> labour <strong>in</strong>tensive forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> such as horse rac<strong>in</strong>g and cas<strong>in</strong>os, and<br />

greater potential for employment losses with automated forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> such as EGMs.<br />

There are a couple <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> data that can potentially speak to employment impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> for Alberta. One source is the prov<strong>in</strong>cial database for registered gam<strong>in</strong>g workers.<br />

Anyone who is paid to assist a licensed <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> facility (e.g., cas<strong>in</strong>o, rac<strong>in</strong>g enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

centre, b<strong>in</strong>go hall) is required to register with the Alberta Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Liquor Commission as a<br />

gam<strong>in</strong>g worker, as a condition <strong>of</strong> employment. This <strong>in</strong>cludes security guards, cashiers, book<br />

keepers, etc., <strong>in</strong> addition to personnel who directly deliver or manage the gam<strong>in</strong>g operations<br />

(e.g., slot operators, slot managers, pit bosses, b<strong>in</strong>go hall manager, etc.). Unfortunately,<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!