gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IMPACTS ON SOCIETY<br />
The citizens <strong>of</strong> Alberta are the ones who partake <strong>in</strong> legalized <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> and are also the primary<br />
recipients <strong>of</strong> the benefits disbursed by the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and charitable organizations.<br />
Thus, they constitute a particularly important sector <strong>in</strong> which impacts are anticipated.<br />
Government and Charitable <strong>Services</strong><br />
As has already been clearly stated, Albertans are the direct recipients and primary beneficiaries<br />
<strong>of</strong> the roughly $2 billion dollars annually that the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government and charity/community<br />
organizations have collected <strong>in</strong> net <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue <strong>in</strong> the past few years (Figure 28, p. 125).<br />
In addition, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007 Albertan citizens <strong>of</strong> First Nations communities have also started<br />
to receive similar direct benefits deriv<strong>in</strong>g from the new First Nations cas<strong>in</strong>os. These collective<br />
benefits are primarily manifest <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed and/or perhaps enhanced public<br />
services, and/or a decreased need to raise <strong>in</strong>voluntary taxes (<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> non-First Nations<br />
communities). These represent some <strong>of</strong> the most important and unambiguously positive<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> legalized <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta. (Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed and/or enhanced public services have<br />
tended to be a reliable impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> across all jurisdictions that have studied this issue<br />
(Williams, Rehm, & Stevens, 2011)).<br />
Employment<br />
Most studies <strong>of</strong> the socioeconomic impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> have found <strong>in</strong>creased employment<br />
associated with <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction (Williams, Rehm, & Stevens, 2011). However, this is<br />
primarily due to the limited scope <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> these studies, <strong>in</strong> that they only exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
employment changes <strong>in</strong> the local region where the new <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> venue was located without<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether there were potential losses <strong>in</strong> other regions. When a larger geographic<br />
scope is used, then net jurisdiction-wide employment ga<strong>in</strong>s are not usually found (Williams,<br />
Rehm, & Stevens, 2011). These same <strong>in</strong>vestigators have also found that there are significantly<br />
different <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> impacts as a function <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. There is greater potential for<br />
employment ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> labour <strong>in</strong>tensive forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> such as horse rac<strong>in</strong>g and cas<strong>in</strong>os, and<br />
greater potential for employment losses with automated forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> such as EGMs.<br />
There are a couple <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> data that can potentially speak to employment impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> for Alberta. One source is the prov<strong>in</strong>cial database for registered gam<strong>in</strong>g workers.<br />
Anyone who is paid to assist a licensed <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> facility (e.g., cas<strong>in</strong>o, rac<strong>in</strong>g enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />
centre, b<strong>in</strong>go hall) is required to register with the Alberta Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Liquor Commission as a<br />
gam<strong>in</strong>g worker, as a condition <strong>of</strong> employment. This <strong>in</strong>cludes security guards, cashiers, book<br />
keepers, etc., <strong>in</strong> addition to personnel who directly deliver or manage the gam<strong>in</strong>g operations<br />
(e.g., slot operators, slot managers, pit bosses, b<strong>in</strong>go hall manager, etc.). Unfortunately,<br />
143