gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is also reflected <strong>in</strong> actual revenues, with lottery ticket revenue, VLT revenue, and<br />
charitable <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue tend<strong>in</strong>g to be higher <strong>in</strong> northern Alberta compared to southern<br />
Alberta.<br />
There is also an important urban-rural difference, with higher VLT revenue per capita <strong>in</strong> rural<br />
areas and higher cas<strong>in</strong>o/charitable revenue per capita <strong>in</strong> urban areas. This is presumably due to<br />
the greater availability <strong>of</strong> VLTs <strong>in</strong> rural areas and a greater availability <strong>of</strong> cas<strong>in</strong>os (and slot<br />
mach<strong>in</strong>es) <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Further to this po<strong>in</strong>t, about 73% <strong>of</strong> cas<strong>in</strong>o revenue appears to derive<br />
from people who live with<strong>in</strong> a 20 km driv<strong>in</strong>g distance <strong>of</strong> the cas<strong>in</strong>o, with especially<br />
disproportionate contributions from people who live with<strong>in</strong> 5 km.<br />
Where is the Money Go<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
Charity groups were the primary direct recipients <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue until 1987, at which<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue started to match charity revenue due to the <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>in</strong>stant w<strong>in</strong> tickets and the <strong>in</strong>creased popularity <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial lottery tickets. This<br />
parity cont<strong>in</strong>ued until 1993. In 1994 prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue began to rapidly outpace<br />
charity revenue due to the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cially owned VLTs, and then slot mach<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
The prov<strong>in</strong>cial government is now the direct recipient <strong>of</strong> approximately 85% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
revenue.<br />
A significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue is immediately redirected because <strong>of</strong> pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agreements regard<strong>in</strong>g commissions, levies, and revenue disbursement. Thus, the more<br />
important question concerns the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue received after these<br />
agreements. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1994 the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government’s percentage <strong>of</strong> total <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue has<br />
ranged from 41% to 58% (42% <strong>in</strong> 2009). Charity/community groups have been the second<br />
largest recipient s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994, with their portion <strong>of</strong> the total rang<strong>in</strong>g from 22% to 38% (32% <strong>in</strong><br />
2009). Private operators (cas<strong>in</strong>o owners, lounges host<strong>in</strong>g VLTs, lottery ticket retailers) have<br />
been the third largest recipient, with their portion <strong>of</strong> the total rang<strong>in</strong>g from 13% to 22% s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1994 (17% <strong>in</strong> 2009). In the past couple <strong>of</strong> years First Nations revenue has grown significantly<br />
and they now receive approximately 6% <strong>of</strong> Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue. The proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue derived from horse rac<strong>in</strong>g has decl<strong>in</strong>ed significantly s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1980s when it<br />
was as high as 21%, and now only constitutes about 2% <strong>of</strong> the total. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the federal<br />
government has always received the smallest proportion <strong>of</strong> net Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue,<br />
which has typically been <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong> the total. In general, the stability observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
relative proportion <strong>of</strong> revenue garnered by different sectors is partly related to the fact that<br />
they all tend to share <strong>in</strong> the revenue from the biggest ‘money maker’ (i.e., EGMs), and they<br />
have tended to received a fixed percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue, as opposed to a flat amount.<br />
The ‘ultimate’ recipients <strong>of</strong> almost all Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue are the citizens <strong>of</strong> Alberta. This<br />
is certa<strong>in</strong>ly the case for prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue where virtually all <strong>of</strong> this money is spent<br />
on government services to benefit Albertans (e.g., health, education, <strong>in</strong>frastructure). The same<br />
260