18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is also reflected <strong>in</strong> actual revenues, with lottery ticket revenue, VLT revenue, and<br />

charitable <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue tend<strong>in</strong>g to be higher <strong>in</strong> northern Alberta compared to southern<br />

Alberta.<br />

There is also an important urban-rural difference, with higher VLT revenue per capita <strong>in</strong> rural<br />

areas and higher cas<strong>in</strong>o/charitable revenue per capita <strong>in</strong> urban areas. This is presumably due to<br />

the greater availability <strong>of</strong> VLTs <strong>in</strong> rural areas and a greater availability <strong>of</strong> cas<strong>in</strong>os (and slot<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>es) <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Further to this po<strong>in</strong>t, about 73% <strong>of</strong> cas<strong>in</strong>o revenue appears to derive<br />

from people who live with<strong>in</strong> a 20 km driv<strong>in</strong>g distance <strong>of</strong> the cas<strong>in</strong>o, with especially<br />

disproportionate contributions from people who live with<strong>in</strong> 5 km.<br />

Where is the Money Go<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Charity groups were the primary direct recipients <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue until 1987, at which<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue started to match charity revenue due to the <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>in</strong>stant w<strong>in</strong> tickets and the <strong>in</strong>creased popularity <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial lottery tickets. This<br />

parity cont<strong>in</strong>ued until 1993. In 1994 prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue began to rapidly outpace<br />

charity revenue due to the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cially owned VLTs, and then slot mach<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

The prov<strong>in</strong>cial government is now the direct recipient <strong>of</strong> approximately 85% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

revenue.<br />

A significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue is immediately redirected because <strong>of</strong> pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agreements regard<strong>in</strong>g commissions, levies, and revenue disbursement. Thus, the more<br />

important question concerns the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue received after these<br />

agreements. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1994 the prov<strong>in</strong>cial government’s percentage <strong>of</strong> total <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue has<br />

ranged from 41% to 58% (42% <strong>in</strong> 2009). Charity/community groups have been the second<br />

largest recipient s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994, with their portion <strong>of</strong> the total rang<strong>in</strong>g from 22% to 38% (32% <strong>in</strong><br />

2009). Private operators (cas<strong>in</strong>o owners, lounges host<strong>in</strong>g VLTs, lottery ticket retailers) have<br />

been the third largest recipient, with their portion <strong>of</strong> the total rang<strong>in</strong>g from 13% to 22% s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1994 (17% <strong>in</strong> 2009). In the past couple <strong>of</strong> years First Nations revenue has grown significantly<br />

and they now receive approximately 6% <strong>of</strong> Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue. The proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue derived from horse rac<strong>in</strong>g has decl<strong>in</strong>ed significantly s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1980s when it<br />

was as high as 21%, and now only constitutes about 2% <strong>of</strong> the total. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the federal<br />

government has always received the smallest proportion <strong>of</strong> net Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue,<br />

which has typically been <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong> the total. In general, the stability observed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

relative proportion <strong>of</strong> revenue garnered by different sectors is partly related to the fact that<br />

they all tend to share <strong>in</strong> the revenue from the biggest ‘money maker’ (i.e., EGMs), and they<br />

have tended to received a fixed percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue, as opposed to a flat amount.<br />

The ‘ultimate’ recipients <strong>of</strong> almost all Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue are the citizens <strong>of</strong> Alberta. This<br />

is certa<strong>in</strong>ly the case for prov<strong>in</strong>cial government revenue where virtually all <strong>of</strong> this money is spent<br />

on government services to benefit Albertans (e.g., health, education, <strong>in</strong>frastructure). The same<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!